Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May;18(5):319-327.
doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00384. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Clinical Review on the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Review on the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Nicholas P McAndrew et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May.

Abstract

The natural history of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer tends to be more favorable than other subtypes such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-amplified and triple-negative. In addition, the natural dependence on steroid hormone signaling has allowed for therapeutic targeting of this pathway and significant improvements in survival while maintaining quality of life: the two main goals in management of the disease. The sequential use of endocrine agents including the selective estrogen receptor modulators (tamoxifen), aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) and the selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant has been the backbone of management for years. In the past decade, the introduction of molecularly targeted agents against intracellular targets such as mammalian target of rapamycin (everolimus), cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (alpelisib) has offered patients effective nonchemotherapy-based options, which are improving outcomes. Although knowledge gaps still exist in regard to the optimal sequencing of these new regimens, they have expanded our repertoire of options for patients and have shifted the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy and its associated complications to later lines. Still, formatting a plan for these patients includes taking into account traditional prognostic factors such as menopausal status, previous treatments, disease-free interval for those patients with early breast cancer that has recurred, and tumor burden. To assist in developing this treatment plan, we will review the current data with systemic agents in the management of these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nicholas P. McAndrewHonoraria: Daiichi SankyoConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Genomic Health, BioTheranosticsSpeakers' Bureau: NovartisResearch Funding: Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Dizal PharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Daiichi Sanko, Trio Richard S. FinnConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Lilly, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, CStone PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Eisai, Lilly, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/GenentechExpert Testimony: BayerNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Comment in

MeSH terms