Assessment of glomerular filtration rate measurement in dogs using dynamic contrast CT compared to serum iohexol clearance
- PMID: 34637569
- DOI: 10.1111/vru.13024
Assessment of glomerular filtration rate measurement in dogs using dynamic contrast CT compared to serum iohexol clearance
Abstract
Dynamic contrast CT with Patlak plot analysis can be used to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, several studies have shown different GFR values and they are most likely less than the values by the standard techniques. The purpose of this prospective, experimental, and method comparison study was to evaluate the GFR using a CT technique (CT-GFR) in 12 healthy dogs compared to serum iohexol clearance (SIC-GFR). All dogs were anesthetized and placed in the right lateral recumbency position and the caudal part was lifted inside the CT gantry. A single-slice dynamic CT of the aorta and both kidneys was scanned sequentially every 2 s for 2 min after a bolus injection (3 mL/s) of iohexol (300 mg/kg). Time attenuation curves (TAC) were constructed and the GFR per volume of kidney was calculated using the Patlak plot analysis method based on 30-120 s time intervals, and results were compared to global GFR from SIC that was determined with eight blood samples for up to 240 min. The CT-GFR value (1.85 ± 0.48 mL/min/kg) was significantly less than the SIC-GFR value (3.40 ± 0.80 mL/min/kg; P < .05). The CT-GFR was correlated with SIC-GFR by the coefficient of correlation (r) at 0.61 (P = .046). In conclusion, the CT-GFR underestimated SIC-GFR and should be used carefully. We suggest that the GFR should be calculated using the equation derived from linear regression between CT-GFR and the standard GFR method. With its own particular parameters, each institute should have its own prediction equation.
Keywords: contrast-enhanced CT; plasma clearance method; renal function.
© 2021 American College of Veterinary Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Determination of glomerular filtration rate in dogs using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2006.00118.x. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006. PMID: 16553143
-
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in healthy cats using single-slice dynamic CT and Patlak plot analysis.Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 Mar-Apr;53(2):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01899.x. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012. PMID: 22182065
-
Single-slice dynamic computed tomographic determination of glomerular filtration rate by use of Patlak plot analysis in anesthetized pigs.Am J Vet Res. 2007 Mar;68(3):297-304. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.3.297. Am J Vet Res. 2007. PMID: 17331020
-
Assessment of glomerular filtration rate with dynamic computed tomography in normal Beagle dogs.J Vet Sci. 2011 Dec;12(4):393-9. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.4.393. J Vet Sci. 2011. PMID: 22122906 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of glomerular filtration rate testing in dogs and cats.Vet J. 2011 May;188(2):156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 11. Vet J. 2011. PMID: 20541957 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Liedtke R, Duarte C. Laboratory protocols and methods for measurement of glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. In: CG D (ed): Ren Funct Test. Boston: Little, Brown&Co; 1980:49-63.
-
- Finco DR, Barsanti JA. Clinical evaluation of renal function: A critical appraisal of procedures and interpretations. In: Kirk RW (ed): Current Veterinary Therapy X. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1989:1123-1126.
-
- Linnetz EH, Graves TK. Glomerular filtration rate in general small animal practice. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2010;32:1-6.
-
- Von Hendy-Willson VE, Pressler BM. An overview of glomerular filtration rate testing in dogs and cats. Vet J. 2011;188:156-165.
-
- Gleadhill A, Michell AR. Evaluation of iohexol as a marker for the clinical measurement of glomerular filtration rate in dogs. Res Vet Sci. 1996;60:117-121.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources