Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;132(3):2342-2354.
doi: 10.1111/jam.15324. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Anaerobic soil disinfestation, amendment-type, and irrigation regimen influence Salmonella survival and die-off in agricultural soils

Affiliations

Anaerobic soil disinfestation, amendment-type, and irrigation regimen influence Salmonella survival and die-off in agricultural soils

Claire M Murphy et al. J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: This study investigated Salmonella concentrations following combinations of horticultural practices including anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), soil amendment type and irrigation regimen.

Methods and results: Sandy-loam soil was inoculated with a five-serovar Salmonella cocktail (5.5 ± 0.2 log CFU per gram) and subjected to one of six treatments: (i) no soil amendment, ASD (ASD control), (ii) no soil amendment, no-ASD (non-ASD control) and (iii-vi) soil amended with pelletized poultry litter, rye, rapeseed or hairy vetch with ASD. The effect of irrigation regimen was determined by collecting samples 3 and 7 days after irrigation. Twenty-five-gram soil samples were collected pre-ASD, post-soil saturation (i.e. ASD-process), and at 14 time-points post-ASD, and Salmonella levels enumerated. Log-linear models examined the effect of amendment type and irrigation regimen on Salmonella die-off during and post-ASD. During ASD, Salmonella concentrations significantly decreased in all treatments (range: -0.2 to -2.7 log CFU per gram), albeit the smallest decrease (-0.2 log CFU per gram observed in the pelletized poultry litter) was of negligible magnitude. Salmonella die-off rates varied by amendment with an average post-ASD rate of -0.05 log CFU per gram day (CI = -0.05, -0.04). Salmonella concentrations remained highest over the 42 days post-ASD in pelletized poultry litter, followed by rapeseed, and hairy vetch treatments. Findings suggested ASD was not able to eliminate Salmonella in soil, and certain soil amendments facilitated enhanced Salmonella survival. Salmonella serovar distribution differed by treatment with pelletized poultry litter supporting S. Newport survival, compared with other serovars. Irrigation appeared to assist Salmonella survival with concentrations being 0.14 log CFU per gram (CI = 0.05, 0.23) greater 3 days, compared with 7 days post-irrigation.

Conclusions: ASD does not eliminate Salmonella in soil, and may in fact, depending on the soil amendment used, facilitate Salmonella survival.

Significance and impact of the study: Synergistic and antagonistic effects on food safety hazards of implementing horticultural practices should be considered.

Keywords: Salmonella; anaerobic soil disinfection; die-off; fumigation; horticulture; irrigation; preharvest; soil amendment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change in observed Salmonella concentration (A) during each step of ASD (pre-ASD, post-soil saturation, post-ASD at d 0) and (B) between 0 and 42 days post-ASD (0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 24, 28, 31, 35, 38 and 42 d post-ASD) for each treatment [red = ASD, non-amended; Pink = non-ASD, non-amended; blue = ASD, rye amended; teal = ASD, rapeseed amended; yellow = ASD, hairy vetch amended; green = ASD, pelletized poultry litter amended soil].The post-ASD plot (B) shows Loess smoothed trendlines with 95% confidence intervals (gray shading). n = 24 for each treatment and time-point.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Prevalence of each inoculation strain at each time point (A) and in each treatment (B) [AC = ASD, non-amended; NAC = non-ASD, non-amended; RY = ASD, rye amended; RS = ASD, rapeseed amended; HV = ASD, hairy vetch amended; PL = ASD, pelletized poultry litter amended soil]. Serovars: Braendrup (red), Javiana (yellow), Newport (teal), Poona (blue) and Saintpaul (pink).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aguado V, Vitas A and Garcıa-Jalón I (2004) Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua from a vegetable processing plant by RAPD and REA. Int. J. Food Microbiol, 90, 341–347. - PubMed
    1. Andrews WH, Acobson A and Hammack T (2011) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Chapter 5 Salmonella [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bacteriological-analyti... [Accessed April 20 2020].
    1. Bell RL, Zheng J, Burrows E, Allard S, Wang CY, Keys CE, Melka DC, Strain E, Luo Y and Allard MW (2015) Ecological prevalence, genetic diversity, and epidemiological aspects of Salmonella isolated from tomato agricultural regions of the Virginia Eastern Shore. Front Microbiol, 6, 415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biswas S, Pandey PK and Farver TB (2016) Assessing the impacts of temperature and storage on Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and L. monocytogenes decay in dairy manure. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 39, 901–913. - PubMed
    1. Braden CR (2006) Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: a national epidemic in the United States. Clin Infect Dis, 43, 512–517. - PubMed