Regional analgesia techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis
- PMID: 34638182
- PMCID: PMC9171539
- DOI: 10.4097/kja.21330
Regional analgesia techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of regional analgesic interventions for VATS using a network meta-analysis (NMA).
Methods: We searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the analgesic effects of the following interventions: control, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), serratus plane block (SPB), and intercostal nerve block (INB). The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24-h postoperative period. Pain scores were also collected during three different postoperative periods: the early (0-6 h), middle (6-18 h), and late (18-24 h) periods.
Results: A total of 21 RCTs (1391 patients) were included. TPVB showed the greatest effect on opioid consumption compared with the control (mean difference [MD] = -13.2 mg; 95% CI [-16.2, -10.1]). In terms of pain scores in the early period, ESPB had the greatest effect compared to control (MD = -1.6; 95% CI [-2.3, -0.9]). In the middle and late periods, pain scores showed that TPVB, ESPB and INB had superior analgesic effects compared to controls, while SPB did not.
Conclusions: TPVB had the best analgesic efficacy following VATS, though the analgesic efficacy of ESPBs was comparable. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal regional analgesia technique to improve postoperative pain control following VATS.
Keywords: Nerve block; Network meta-analysis; Opioid analgesics; Postoperative pain; Review; Video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:836–44. - PubMed
-
- Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976–81. - PubMed
-
- Maxwell C, Nicoara A. New developments in the treatment of acute pain after thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27:6–11. - PubMed
-
- Neustein SM, McCormick PJ. Postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive thoracoscopy: what should we do? Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:423–5, 425-7. - PubMed
-
- Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, et al. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1026–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
