Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 7;13(19):3428.
doi: 10.3390/polym13193428.

Surface Treatments of Coffee Husk Fiber Waste for Effective Incorporation into Polymer Biocomposites

Affiliations

Surface Treatments of Coffee Husk Fiber Waste for Effective Incorporation into Polymer Biocomposites

Bárbara Maria Mateus Gonçalves et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Natural lignocellulose fibers have been extensively investigated and applied as a reinforcement of polymer composites in industrial applications from food packing to automotive parts. Among the advantages of natural fibers stands their relatively low cost and sustainable characteristics. These are accentuated in the case of residual fibers such as those obtained from coffee husks, an agribusiness waste, usually burnt or disposed into the environment. As composite reinforcement, hydrophilic natural fibers display adhesion problems to the most hydrophobic polymer matrices. This adhesion might be improved with distinct types of fibers surface treatments. In the present work, the effectiveness of three surface treatments applied to coffee husk fiber wastes (CHFW) were investigated, aiming to improve the tensile performance of castor oil-based polyurethane (COPU) biocomposites. The effects of treatments associated with (i) chemical with sodium hydroxide, (ii) physical by temperature and pressure and hydrothermic treatment, and (iii) biological by fermentation with Phanerochaete Chrysosporium fungus were evaluated by means of Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermal analyses and morphology by scanning electron microscopy for different concentration of NaOH, different hydrothermic times at 121 °C/98 kPa and exposition to P. chrysosporium. The most effective treatment was the hydrothermal one at 121 °C and 98.06 kPa for 30 min. Preliminary tensile tests were performed in COPU biocomposites reinforced with 20% CHFWs subjected to the optimized conditions for each distinct type of treatment. The results indicated that the hydrothermal treatment promoted significant enhancement in the fiber/matrix interfacial bond, increasing the tensile strength up to 60% compared to COPU reinforced with in natura CHFWs fibers. It is important to mention that these composites can be applied as plastic wood for household items' internal parts and in the automobile industry.

Keywords: coffee husk fiber; fiber surface; polymer biocomposite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Coffee husk fiber waste (CHFW).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standard specimen for the tensile test; (a) before test and (b) after test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FTIR spectrum of (a) in natura CHFW; (b) NaOH; (c) HYDRO; and (d) BIO treatments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FTIR spectrum of (a) in natura CHFW; (b) NaOH; (c) HYDRO; and (d) BIO treatments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
XRD for samples after chemical treatments, (a) in natura CHFW; (b) NaOH; (c) HYDRO; and (d) BIO treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Photomicrographs of fresh in natura CHFW; (a) 500× and (b) 1000×.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Photomicrographs of CHFW after NaOH 5 (a,b); NaOH 10 (c,d); and NaOH 20 (e,f) treatments.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Photomicrographs of CHFW after HYD 30 (a,b); HYD 60 (c,d); and HYD 120 (e,f) treatments.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Photomicrographs of CHFW after BIO 24 (a,b); BIO 48 (c,d); BIO 72 (e,f); and BIO 96 (g,h) treatments.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) TGA NaOH, (b) TGA HYD, (c) TGA BIO, and (d) DTG for fresh CHFW, in natura, as well as subject to NaOH, HYD, and BIO treatment.
Figure 10
Figure 10
DSC for (a) NaOH; (b) HDY; and (c) BIO treatment.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Tensile strength of composites with 20% treated and untreated CHFW.
Figure 12
Figure 12
SEM micrographs of the fracture surface of composites with 20% CHFW after the following treatments: (a) in natura; (b) NaOH 5; (c) HYD 30; (d) BIO 24.

References

    1. Zhang Z., Cai S., Li Y., Wang Z., Long Y., Yu T., Shen Y. High performances of plant fiber reiforced composites a new insight from hierarchical microstructures. Compos. Sci. Techinol. 2020;194:10815. doi: 10.1016/j.comscitech.2020.108151. - DOI
    1. Luz F.S., Garcia Filho F.C., Del-Rio M.T.C., Nascimento L.F.C., Pinehro W.A., Monteiro S.N. Graphene-Incorporated Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A First Overview. Polymers. 2020;12:1601. doi: 10.3390/polym12071601. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mokhothu T.H., John M.J. Review on hygroscopic aging of cellulose fibres and their biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;131:337–354. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sood M., Dwivedi G. Effect of fiber treatment on flexural properties of natural fiber reinforced composites: A review. Egypt. J. Pet. 2018;27:775–783. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.11.005. - DOI
    1. Sung S.H., Chang Y., Han J. Development of polylactic acid nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from coffee silverskin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;169:495–503. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.037. - DOI - PubMed