Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20239.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99050-0.

Estimated pulse wave velocity improves risk stratification for all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19

Collaborators, Affiliations

Estimated pulse wave velocity improves risk stratification for all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19

Kimon Stamatelopoulos et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Accurate risk stratification in COVID-19 patients consists a major clinical need to guide therapeutic strategies. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), a marker of arterial stiffness which reflects overall arterial integrity and aging, in risk stratification of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study, analyzed a total population of 1671 subjects consisting of 737 hospitalized COVID-19 patients consecutively recruited from two tertiary centers (Newcastle cohort: n = 471 and Pisa cohort: n = 266) and a non-COVID control cohort (n = 934). Arterial stiffness was calculated using validated formulae for ePWV. ePWV progressively increased across the control group, COVID-19 survivors and deceased patients (adjusted mean increase per group 1.89 m/s, P < 0.001). Using a machine learning approach, ePWV provided incremental prognostic value and improved reclassification for mortality over the core model including age, sex and comorbidities [AUC (core model + ePWV vs. core model) = 0.864 vs. 0.755]. ePWV provided similar prognostic value when pulse pressure or hs-Troponin were added to the core model or over its components including age and mean blood pressure (p < 0.05 for all). The optimal prognostic ePWV value was 13.0 m/s. ePWV conferred additive discrimination (AUC: 0.817 versus 0.779, P < 0.001) and reclassification value (NRI = 0.381, P < 0.001) over the 4C Mortality score, a validated score for predicting mortality in COVID-19 and the Charlson comorbidity index. We suggest that calculation of ePWV, a readily applicable estimation of arterial stiffness, may serve as an additional clinical tool to refine risk stratification of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 beyond established risk factors and scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Histogram and Kernel Density Estimates of the ePWV in patients with COVID-19 and controls after propensity matching for age, sex, smoking, hypertension, CKD, diabetes mellitus, smoking, history of CVD and hyperlipidemia. (B) Difference in ePWV among control subjects without COVID-19, COVID-19 patients who were discharged from hospital and 28-day deceased patients with COVID-19. Estimates of ePWV are adjusted for sex, hypertension, CKD, DM, smoking, history of CVD and hyperlipidemia. Circles represent mean value of ePWV per group and bars the 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate significant (P < 0.001) difference from the reference category (i.e., controls from the Athens Vascular Registry). CKD: chronic kidney disease, DM: diabetes mellitus, CVD: cardiovascular disease, including history of coronary artery disease and/or heart failure, PWV: pulse wave velocity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and corresponding areas under the ROC curve for ePWV on top of the baseline model with respect to 28-day death. Areas under the curve were derived from an appropriate test set (20% of the total sample) after 1,000 bootstrap replicates and training of the boost gradient algorithm on the remaining 80% of the population (training set). Baseline model included age, sex, history of hypertension, DM, CKD, CVD, lung disease and active cancer. To enhance visual clarity a limited number of bootstrapped ROC curves are provided in pale colors as opposed to intense blue and red average estimates. AUC: area under the curve, CKD: chronic kidney disease, DM: diabetes mellitus, CVD: cardiovascular disease including history of coronary artery disease and/or heart failure, ePWV: estimated pulse wave velocity.

References

    1. Liang, W. et al. Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern. Med.180, 1081–1089. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iaccarino, G. et al. Age and multimorbidity predict death among COVID-19 patients: Results of the SARS-RAS study of the Italian Society of Hypertension. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979)76, 366–372. 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15324 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Hu, Y. et al. Prevalence and severity of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Virol.127, 104371. 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104371 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Figliozzi, S. et al. Predictors of adverse prognosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest50, e13362. 10.1111/eci.13362 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Del Sole, F. et al. Features of severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest50, e13378. 10.1111/eci.13378 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types