Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: Summary and consensus statements of group 1-The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021
- PMID: 34642977
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13809
Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: Summary and consensus statements of group 1-The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021
Abstract
Objectives: This publication reports on the EAO workshop group 1 summaries, discussions and consensus statements based on four systematic reviews evaluating the impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading.
Materials and methods: The first of the systematic reviews was on the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading in the biological outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. The second systematic review evaluated the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading on the aesthetic outcomes in single-tooth implants. The third systematic review was on the long-term outcomes of maxillary single-tooth implants in relation to timing protocols of implant placement and loading and the fourth on patient's perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry. The group evaluated these systematic reviews, provided comments and additions as required and agreed on the relevant consensus statements as well as on clinical and research recommendations.
Results: Different timings of implant placement/loading presented with high implant survival rates. The systematic reviews evaluated from this working group provided a number of conclusions based on the available/current literature. However, the specific topic of timing is an area that further research is required in order to provide detailed guidelines for the different protocols to be employed.
Keywords: augmentation; biological outcomes; bone level changes; delayed loading; delayed placement; dental implant; early loading; early placement; immediate loading; immediate placement; implant survival; implant-supported multiple-unit FDPs; patient satisfaction; patient-reported outcome measures; soft tissue-implant interactions; survival rate; timing of implant loading; timing of implant placement.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aiquel, L. , Pitta, J. , Antonoglou, G. , Mischak, I. , Sailer, I. , & Payer, M. (2021). Does the timing of implant placement and loading influence biological outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl. 21), 5-27.
-
- Belser, U. C. , Grutter, L. , Vailati, F. , Bornstein, M. M. , Weber, H. P. , & Buser, D. (2009). Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. Journal of Periodontology, 80(1), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
-
- Francisco, H. , Duarte, M. , Pinto, A. K. , & Carames, J. (2021). Is timing of implant placement and loading influencing aesthetic outcomes in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl. 21), 28-55.
-
- Furhauser, R. , Florescu, D. , Benesch, T. , Haas, R. , Mailath, G. , & Watzek, G. (2005). Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16(6), 639-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x
-
- Gallucci, G. O. , Hamilton, A. , Zhou, W. , Buser, D. , & Chen, S. (2018). Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl. 16), 106-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13276
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
