Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D1091-D1099.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab887.

RGD v2.0: a major update of the ruminant functional and evolutionary genomics database

Affiliations

RGD v2.0: a major update of the ruminant functional and evolutionary genomics database

Weiwei Fu et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

Ruminant Genome Database (RGD; http://animal.nwsuaf.edu.cn/RGD) provides visualization and analysis tools for ruminant comparative genomics and functional annotations. As more high-quality ruminant genome assemblies have become available, we have redesigned the user interface, integrated and expanded multi-omics data, and developed novel features to improve the database. The new version, RGD v2.0, houses 78 ruminant genomes; 110-species synteny alignments for major livestock (including cattle, sheep, goat) and wild ungulates; 21 012 orthologous gene clusters with Gene Ontology and pathway annotation; ∼8 600 000 conserved elements; and ∼1 000 000 cis-regulatory elements by utilizing 1053 epigenomic data sets. The transcriptome data in RGD v2.0 has nearly doubled, currently with 1936 RNA-seq data sets, and 155 174 phenotypic data sets have been newly added. New and updated features include: (i) The UCSC Genome Browser, BLAT, BLAST and Table Browser tools were updated for six available ruminant livestock species. (ii) The LiftOver tool was newly introduced into our browser to allow coordinate conversion between different ruminant assemblies. And (iii) tissue specificity index, tau, was calculated to facilitate batch screening of specifically expressed genes. The enhanced genome annotations and improved functionality in RGD v2.0 will be useful for study of genome evolution, environmental adaption, livestock breeding and biomedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The processing pipeline used to construct RGD v2.0. RGD v2.0 integrated comparative genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics and phenotypic data. Users can search a gene symbol or a genomic region to get results in an interactive table and graph.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An example of Cervidae-specific diverged sites in the 3’UTR of the NOVA1 gene. (A) NOVA1 gene structure and conserved elements in 100 vertebrates and 30 mammals. (B) Cervidae uniquely divergent sites present in NOVA1. We display the new tracks of 110-species alignments and conserved elements. And 29 genomes were assembled based on third-generation sequencing platform.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Application of the regulatory data and multiple genome alignments to identify the key variations of PLAG1 gene. (A) The heat map on the left shows the emission probabilities of 15-chromatin state identified by ChromHMM based on the data of six epigenomic markers (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K27me3, CTCF and ATAC-seq) from nine bovine tissues. The heat maps in the middle and right show the overlap enrichment for various genomic annotations. (B) Two candidate variations, ss319607405 (14:23375648–23375650), and ss319607406 (14:23375692), were located in the active transcriptional start site (TSS) and promoter regions, and overlapped with a highly conserved element. (C) Detailed regulatory signals and multiple sequence alignments around these two variations.

Similar articles

  • The UCSC genome browser database: update 2007.
    Kuhn RM, Karolchik D, Zweig AS, Trumbower H, Thomas DJ, Thakkapallayil A, Sugnet CW, Stanke M, Smith KE, Siepel A, Rosenbloom KR, Rhead B, Raney BJ, Pohl A, Pedersen JS, Hsu F, Hinrichs AS, Harte RA, Diekhans M, Clawson H, Bejerano G, Barber GP, Baertsch R, Haussler D, Kent WJ. Kuhn RM, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D668-73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl928. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. PMID: 17142222 Free PMC article.
  • Galbase: a comprehensive repository for integrating chicken multi-omics data.
    Fu W, Wang R, Xu N, Wang J, Li R, Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Nie Q, Zhao X, Han J, Yang N, Jiang Y. Fu W, et al. BMC Genomics. 2022 May 12;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08598-2. BMC Genomics. 2022. PMID: 35549894 Free PMC article.
  • Bovine Genome Database: new annotation tools for a new reference genome.
    Shamimuzzaman M, Le Tourneau JJ, Unni DR, Diesh CM, Triant DA, Walsh AT, Tayal A, Conant GC, Hagen DE, Elsik CG. Shamimuzzaman M, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D676-D681. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz944. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. PMID: 31647100 Free PMC article.
  • Genetic advancements and future directions in ruminant livestock breeding: from reference genomes to multiomics innovations.
    Xu S, Akhatayeva Z, Liu J, Feng X, Yu Y, Badaoui B, Esmailizadeh A, Kantanen J, Amills M, Lenstra JA, Johansson AM, Coltman DW, Liu GE, Curik I, Orozco-terWengel P, Paiva SR, Zinovieva NA, Zhang L, Yang J, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yu Y, Li M. Xu S, et al. Sci China Life Sci. 2025 Apr;68(4):934-960. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2744-4. Epub 2024 Nov 26. Sci China Life Sci. 2025. PMID: 39609363 Review.
  • Exploring human disease using the Rat Genome Database.
    Shimoyama M, Laulederkind SJ, De Pons J, Nigam R, Smith JR, Tutaj M, Petri V, Hayman GT, Wang SJ, Ghiasvand O, Thota J, Dwinell MR. Shimoyama M, et al. Dis Model Mech. 2016 Oct 1;9(10):1089-1095. doi: 10.1242/dmm.026021. Dis Model Mech. 2016. PMID: 27736745 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Hofmann R.R. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia. 1989; 78:443–457. - PubMed
    1. Hackmann T.J., Spain J.N.. Invited review: ruminant ecology and evolution: perspectives useful to ruminant livestock research and production. J. Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:1320–1334. - PubMed
    1. Larson G., Burger J.. A population genetics view of animal domestication. Trends Genet. 2013; 29:197–205. - PubMed
    1. Hassanin A., Douzery E.J.. Molecular and morphological phylogenies of ruminantia and the alternative position of the moschidae. Syst. Biol. 2003; 52:206–228. - PubMed
    1. Chen L., Qiu Q., Jiang Y., Wang K., Lin Z., Li Z., Bibi F., Yang Y., Wang J., Nie W.et al. .. Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits. Science. 2019; 364:eaav6202. - PubMed

Publication types