Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 11:29:e20210320.
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0320. eCollection 2021.

Cephalometric predictors of hypernasality and nasal air emission

Affiliations

Cephalometric predictors of hypernasality and nasal air emission

María Alicia Denegri et al. J Appl Oral Sci. .

Abstract

Background: During times of increasingly recognized importance of interprofessional practices, professionals in Medicine, Dentistry, and Speech Pathology areas cooperate to optimize treatment of velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD), after primary palatoplasty for correction of cleft palate.

Objective: Our study aims to compare velar length, velar thickness, and depth of the nasopharynx of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with the presence, or absence, of hypernasality and nasal air emission; and to verify if the depth:length ratio, between nasopharynx and velum, would be predictive of consistent hypernasality and nasal air emission (speech signs of VPD).

Methodology: Cephalometric radiographs and outcome of speech assessment were obtained from 429 individuals, between 6 and 9 years of age, with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate. Velar length, velar thickness, depth of the nasopharynx, depth:length ratio, scores of hypernasality, and scores of nasal air emission were studied and compared; grouping the radiographs according to presence or absence of hypernasality and nasal air emission.

Results: For the group with speech signs of velopharyngeal dysfunction (those with consistent hypernasality and nasal air emission), the velums were shorter and thinner; the nasopharynx was deeper and the depth:length ratio was larger than the group without hypernasality and nasal air emission. Velar length was significantly shorter in individuals with consistent hypernasality and nasal air emission (p<0.001) and with history of palatal fistula (p=0.032). Depth of nasopharynx was significantly greater in individuals with consistent hypernasality and nasal air emission (p<0.001). Depthlength ratio was significantly larger in individuals with consistent hypernasality and nasal air emission (p<0.001). A depth:length ratio larger than 0.93 was always associated with speech signs of VPD.

Conclusion: Estimated with cephalometric radiographs, a depth:length ratio greater than 0.93, between the nasopharyngeal space and the velum, was 100% accurate in predicting hypernasality and nasal air emission after primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. 1 - Fayyaz GQ, Gill NA, Ishaq I, Aslam M, Chaudry A, Ganatra MA, et al. Pakistan comprehensive fistula classification: a novel scheme and algorithm for management of palatal fistula/dehiscence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):140e-151e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005169 - PubMed
    1. 2 - Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial differences. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 2018:55(1):137-56. doi: 10.1177/1055665617739564 - PubMed
    1. 3 - Williams NW, Henningsson G, Pegoraro-Krook MI. Radiographic assessment of velopharyngeal function for speech. In: Bzoch KR, editor. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. 5th ed. Austin: Pro-ed; 2004. p. 517-67.
    1. 4 - Subtelny JD. A cephalometric study of the growth of the soft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1957;19:49-62. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195701000-00007 - PubMed
    1. 5 - Schendel SA, Oeschlaeger M, Wolford LM, Epker BN. Velopharyngeal anatomy and maxillary advancement. J Maxillofac Surg. 1979;7(2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0503(79)80023-5 - PubMed