Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;28(5):538-546.
doi: 10.1177/15910199211046424. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Eloquence-based reperfusion scoring and its ability to predict post-thrombectomy disability and functional status

Affiliations

Eloquence-based reperfusion scoring and its ability to predict post-thrombectomy disability and functional status

Elliot Pressman et al. Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Angiographic reperfusion after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke is commonly graded using volume-based reperfusion scores such as the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarct score. The location of non-reperfused regions is not included in modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarct score. We studied the predictive ability of an eloquence-based reperfusion score.

Methods: Consecutive cases of endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation strokes performed between January 2018 and April 2020 were included. Digital subtraction angiograms were reviewed by two blinded neurointerventionalist operators. Incomplete reperfusion was further classified by lobar regions lacking reperfusion to create various cohorts. Outcomes were graded four to seven days post-procedure with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90 days post-procedure with the modified Rankin Scale.

Results: One hundred patients were identified. Via multivariate analysis, we found that frontal lobe non-reperfusion (mean difference (MD) = -1.60, p = 0.002) and occipital lobe non-reperfusion (MD = -1.68, p = 0.001) were associated with worse mental status improvement while left-sided stroke (MD = 2.02, p < 0.001) featured better improvement post-thrombectomy. Occipital lobe non-reperfusion (MD = -0.734, p = 0.009) was associated with the worse improvement of visual fields. The non-reperfusion of the frontal lobe was associated with a 1.732-worse NIHSS hemibody strength score (95% confidence interval (95%CI) = -3.39 to -0.072, p = 0.041). Worse improvement in NIHSS scores was found to be associated with frontal lobe non-reperfusion (MD = -5.34, 95%CI = -9.52 to -1.18, p = 0.013) and occipital lobe non-reperfusion (MD = -6.35, 95%CI = -10.4 to -2.31, p = 0.002). Odds of achieving modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days were decreased with frontal lobe non-reperfusion (odds ratio (OR) = 0.279, 95%CI = 0.090-0.869, p = 0.028) and left laterality (OR = 0.376, 95%CI = 0.153-0.922, p = 0.033).

Conclusions: Eloquence-based reperfusion assessment is an important predictor for functional outcomes after thrombectomy.

Keywords: Angiography; disability; eloquence; reperfusion; thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Mokin: Grant NIH R21NS109575; Consultant-Medtronic, Cerenovus; Stock options-Brain Q, Endostream Serenity medical, Synchron. Other authors - none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Lateral digital subtraction angiogram after contrast injection into a patient's right internal carotid artery. Solid lines demarcate major fissures, and dashed lines demarcate the brain further into its respective lobes. These lobes are then associated with the variables with which they have significant associations where “U” represents significant associations via univariate analysis and “M” represents significant associations via multivariate analysis. The respective analysis's p-value follows this demarcation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flowchart depicting patients’ initial sample size, final sample size, and reason for exclusion.

References

    1. Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007; 38: 967–973. - PubMed
    1. Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, et al. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013; 44: 2650–2663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liebeskind DS, Bracard S, Guillemin F, et al. eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 433–438. - PubMed
    1. Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrozella J, et al. Revascularization results in the interventional management of stroke II trial. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 582–587. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phan K, Saleh S, Dmytriw AA, et al. Influence of ASPECTS and endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11: 664–669. - PubMed