Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;20(10):2267-2275.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Serum Carboxypeptidase Activity and Genotype-Stratified CA19-9 to Detect Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Serum Carboxypeptidase Activity and Genotype-Stratified CA19-9 to Detect Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer

Haruyoshi Tanaka et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background and aims: Serum diagnostic markers of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are needed, especially for stage I disease. As tumors grow and cause pancreatic atrophy, markers derived from pancreatic parenchyma such as serum carboxypeptidase A (CPA) activity lose diagnostic performance. We evaluated, with CA19-9, serum CPA as a marker of early pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Serum CPA activity levels were measured in 345 controls undergoing pancreatic surveillance, divided into 2 sets, set 1 being used to establish a reference range. Variants within the CPA1 locus were sought for their association with pancreatic CPA1 expression to determine if such variants associated with serum CPA levels. A total of 190 patients with resectable PDAC were evaluated.

Results: Among controls, those having 1 or more minor alleles of CPA1 variants rs6955723 or rs2284682 had significantly higher serum CPA levels than did those without (P = .001). None of the PDAC cases with pancreatic atrophy had an elevated CPA. Among 122 PDAC cases without atrophy, defining serum CPA diagnostic cutoffs by a subject's CPA1 variants yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 18% at 99% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7-26) (vs 11.1% sensitivity using a uniform diagnostic cutoff); combining CPA with variant-stratified CA19-9 yielded a sensitivity of 68.0% (95% CI, 59.0-76.2) vs 63.1% (95% CI, 53.9- 71.7) for CA19-9 alone; and among stage I PDAC cases, diagnostic sensitivity was 51.9% (95% CI, 31.9-71.3) vs 37.0% (95% CI, 19.4-57.6) for CA19-9 alone. In the validation control set, the variant-stratified diagnostic cutoff yielded a specificity of 98.2%.

Conclusion: Serum CPA activity has diagnostic utility before the emergence of pancreatic atrophy as a marker of localized PDAC, including stage I disease.

Keywords: CA19-9; CPA1; Carboxypeptidase A; Diagnosis; Genotyping; IPMN; Pancreatic Cancer; Serum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Serum CPA activity in PDAC cases and controls and the role of CPA1 genotypes
1A: Serum CPA activity levels in PDAC cases vs. controls. 1B: Serum CPA activity levels and tumor size in PDAC cases with vs. without pancreatic atrophy. 1C: Manhattan plot of 6,629 SNPs located within 1Mbp up/downstream from transcription starting site of CPA1 gene to identify candidate variants which located near upstream or downstream of candidate promoter/enhancer loci. 1D: (left) CPA activity levels in controls by SNP status (rs6955723, rs2284682); major alleles only vs. controls with one or more minor alleles vs. two or more minor alleles. (Intermediate) CPA activity major alleles only vs. one or more minor alleles. (Right) Distribution of alleles for SNPs rs6955723, rs2284682 in controls. 1E: Serum CPA activity levels in the validation set controls by SNP status. *, P<0.05; *** P<0.001.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:7–34. - PubMed
    1. Blackford AL, Canto MI, Klein AP, et al. Recent trends in the incidence and survival of Stage 1A Pancreatic Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020;112:1162–1169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD, et al. Risk of Neoplastic Progression in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Long-term Surveillance. Gastroenterology 2018;155:740–751.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasen H, Ibrahim I, Ponce CG, et al. Benefit of Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals: Outcome of Long-Term Prospective Follow-Up Studies From Three European Expert Centers. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2010–9. - PubMed
    1. Konings IC, Harinck F, Poley JW, et al. Prevalence and Progression of Pancreatic Cystic Precursor Lesions Differ Between Groups at High Risk of Developing Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2017;46:28–34. - PubMed

Publication types