Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;44(5):548-559.
doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

DNA copy number variation: Main characteristics, evolutionary significance, and pathological aspects

Affiliations
Review

DNA copy number variation: Main characteristics, evolutionary significance, and pathological aspects

Ondrej Pös et al. Biomed J. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) were the subject of extensive research in the past years. They are common features of the human genome that play an important role in evolution, contribute to population diversity, development of certain diseases, and influence host-microbiome interactions. CNVs have found application in the molecular diagnosis of many diseases and in non-invasive prenatal care, but their full potential is only emerging. CNVs are expected to have a tremendous impact on screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of several disorders, including cancer and cardiovascular disease. Here, we comprehensively review basic definitions of the term CNV, outline mechanisms and factors involved in CNV formation, and discuss their evolutionary and pathological aspects. We suggest a need for better defined distinguishing criteria and boundaries between known types of CNVs.

Keywords: CNV formation; Copy number variants; Evolution; Genetic diseases; Human genome; Structural variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Publication records. PubMed search for the term “copy number variation” as of July 24, 2020. Limiting results to the year 2004 reduced the number of entries considerably. Excluded entries are highlighted in grey; (A) no filter applied; (B) applying a built-in species-specific filter for “humans”.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of CNV research. It includes research milestones (orange) in the context of evolving methods for the assessment of CNVs (green) and the minimal length of variants to be considered as CNVs at a given time (blue). Main trends of CNV research are visible, e.g., the relatively wide time-frame following the first descriptions of large CNVs around the beginning of the 20th century. This nearly century-long phase was mainly about the development of methods, which finally allowed genome-wide, high-resolution CNV detection around the beginning of the 21st century, leading to the recognition of common features of CNVs and a subsequent shift in their definition, allowing shorter and shorter variants to be considered CNVs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Recurrent vs. non-recurrent rearrangements. Recurrent CNVs have the same size and common breakpoints enriched in low-copy repeats (LCRs). Non-recurrent CNVs with different sizes may share the smallest region of overlap (SRO). CNVs may occur as inherited or de novo events. Inherited CNVs are not recurrent events but always share the same breakpoints, resulting in a similar phenotypic effect. De novo CNVs are independently arising events that may have recurrent or distinct (non-recurrent) breakpoints. Even CNVs with non-recurrent breakpoints may show overlapping effects, as they disrupt the same SRO.

References

    1. Zhang F., Gu W., Hurles M.E., Lupski J.R. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2009;10:451–481. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright D., Boije H., Meadows J.R., Bed’hom B., Gourichon D., Vieaud A., et al. Copy number variation in Intron 1 of SOX5 causes the Pea-comb phenotype in chickens. PLoS Genet. 2009;5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henkel J., Saif R., Jagannathan V., Schmocker C., Zeindler F., Bangerter E., et al. Selection signatures in goats reveal copy number variants underlying breed-defining coat color phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2019;15 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elder P.J.D., Ramsden D.B., Burnett D., Weickert M.O., Barber T.M. Human amylase gene copy number variation as a determinant of metabolic state. Expet Rev Endocrinol Metabol. 2018;13:193–205. - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez E., Kulkarni H., Bolivar H., Mangano A., Sanchez R., Catano G., et al. The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility. Science. 2005;307:1434–1440. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources