Moderate gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy
- PMID: 34650372
- PMCID: PMC8503314
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab108
Moderate gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is defined as severe in the presence of: mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, peak aortic velocity ≥4 m/s, and aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 (or an indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2). However, up to 40% of patients have a discrepancy between gradient and AVA, i.e. AVA ≤1 cm2 (indicating severe AS) and a moderate gradient: >20 and <40 mmHg (typical of moderate stenosis). This condition is called 'low-gradient AS' and includes very heterogeneous clinical entities, with different pathophysiological mechanisms. The diagnostic tools needed to discriminate the different low-gradient AS phenotypes include colour-Doppler echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography, computed tomography scan for the definition of the calcium score, and recently magnetic resonance imaging. The prognostic impact of low-gradient AS is heterogeneous. Classical low-flow low-gradient AS [reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)] has the worst prognosis, followed by paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS (preserved LVEF). Conversely, normal-flow low-gradient AS is associated with a better prognosis. The indications of the guidelines recommend surgical or percutaneous treatment, depending on the risk and comorbidities of the individual patient, both for patients with classic low-flow low-gradient AS and for those with paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Calcium score; Low-flow low-gradient; Severe aortic stenosis; TAVI.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2021.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Impact of Stress Echocardiography on Aortic Valve Stenosis Management.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 14;13(12):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123495. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38930024 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 6;71(5):475-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.052. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29406851
-
Resting Aortic Valve Area at Normal Transaortic Flow Rate Reflects True Valve Area in Suspected Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;8(10):1133-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Sep 9. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26363832
-
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24076528
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0601-0. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25902905 Review.
Cited by
-
Integrating Echocardiographic Findings to Improve Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessments in Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review.J Tehran Heart Cent. 2024 Jul;19(3):153-161. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2024. PMID: 40271169 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A retrospective study: do patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50% benefit from heart valve surgery?J Thorac Dis. 2022 Dec;14(12):4803-4814. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1345. J Thorac Dis. 2022. PMID: 36647496 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Role of Imaging: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 13;14(4):1231. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041231. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40004761 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Classification of Aortic Stenosis Patients via ECG-Independent Multi-Site Measurements of Cardiac-Induced Accelerations and Angular Velocities at the Skin Level.IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 May 20;5:867-876. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3402151. eCollection 2024. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39559782 Free PMC article.
-
Severe low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of inadequate left ventricular responses to high afterload on diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making.Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Nov;27(6):2017-2031. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10240-y. Epub 2022 Apr 16. Heart Fail Rev. 2022. PMID: 35430696 Review.
References
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C.. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;143:e35–e71. - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–2791. - PubMed
-
- Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P.. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007;115:2856–2864. - PubMed
-
- Clavel MA, Burwash IG, Pibarot P.. Cardiac imaging for assessing low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:185–202. - PubMed
-
- Eleid MF, Goel K, Murad MH, Erwin PJ, Suri RM, Greason KL, Nishimura RA, Rihal CS, Holmes DR.. Meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of stroke volume, gradient, and ejection fraction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:989–994. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials