Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10758-10764.
eCollection 2021.

Nursing effect of Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement

Affiliations

Nursing effect of Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement

Bing Lu et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the nursing effect of nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement.

Methods: 94 patients who need to place nasogastric tube and nasojejunal tube to establish enteral nutrition were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n=49) and control group (n=45). The patients in the observation group received nasogastric tube placement and jejunal nutrition tube placement, and the patients in the control group received general gastroscope and placed gastric tube and jejunal nutrition tube through mouth. Success rate of catheterization, catheter pain score, satisfaction score, vital signs, completion time of catheterization, and complication were collected.

Results: the fluctuation of vital signs in control group was significantly higher than that in observation group. There was statistical significance between two groups in vital signs after intervention (P<0.05), mainly manifested in the heart rate, breathing and pulse pressure difference. On the other hand, there was no statistical significance between two groups in pulse oxygen after nursing intervention (P>0.05). The catheter pain score is obviously improved in the observation group compared with control group after intervention. The improvement score of satisfaction in the observation group was 91.47±7.65 points, and that in the control group was 83.64±5.24 points. The completion time of catheterization was improved in the observation group compared with control group. There was statistical significance between two groups in satisfaction score and completion time of catheterization (P<0.05). The rate of abdominal distention and diarrhea in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement has the advantages of simple and fast, short operation time, high success rate and few complications. It is the first choice of intubation method for enteral nutrition support treatment.

Keywords: Nasoscopically; nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement; nursing effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of vital signs between the two groups. Note: Compared with control group, *P<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of VAS score between the two groups before and after intervention. Note: Compared with control group, *P<0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Zanten ARH, De Waele E, Wischmeyer PE. Nutrition therapy and critical illness: practical guidance for the ICU, post-ICU, and long-term convalescence phases. Crit Care. 2019;23:368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambell KJ, Tatucu-Babet OA, Chapple LA, Gantner D, Ridley EJ. Nutrition therapy in critical illness: a review of the literature for clinicians. Crit Care. 2020;24:35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaher S. Nutrition and the gut microbiome during critical illness: a new insight of nutritional therapy. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020;18:22–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de-Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Salomão AB, Waitzberg DL, Dock-Nascimento DB, Correa MITD, Campos ACL, Corsi PR, Portari PE Filho, Caporossi C. ACERTO guidelines of perioperative nutritional interventions in elective general surgery. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44:633–648. - PubMed
    1. Jia ZY, Yang J, Tong DN, Peng JY, Zhang ZW, Liu WJ, Xia Y, Qin HL. Screening of nutritional risk and nutritional support in general surgery patients: a survey from Shanghai, China. Int Surg. 2015;100:841–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources