Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Surveillance
- PMID: 34651010
- PMCID: PMC8506024
- DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.735868
Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Surveillance
Abstract
Aim: This is a narrative review with an aim to summarise and describe urinary biomarkers in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). It provides a summary of FDA-approved protein biomarkers along with emerging ones which utilise genetic, epigenetic and exosomal markers. We discuss the current limitations of the available assays. Background: Current guidelines advice a combination of cystoscopy, imaging,and urine cytology in diagnosis and surveillance. Although cytology has a high specificity, it is limited by low sensitivity particularly in low grade tumours. There are six FDA-approved urinary assays for diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer. They have shown to improve sensitivity and specificity to be used alongside cytology and cystoscopy but have a lower specificity in comparison to cytology and false positives often occur in benign conditions. Recent developments in laboratory techniques has allowed for use of markers which are RNA-, DNA-based as well as extracellular vesicles in the past decade. Methods: Using the PubMed/Medline search engines as well as Google Scholar, we performed an online search using the terms "bladder cancer," "non-muscle invasive bladder cancer," and "urine biomarkers" with filter for articles in English published up to May 2021. Systematic reviews and original data of clinical trials or observational studies which contributed to the development of the biomarkers were collated. Results: Biomarkers identified were divided into FDA-approved molecular biomarkers, protein biomarkers and gene-related biomarker with a table summarising the findings of each marker with the most relevant studies. The studies conducted were mainly retrospective. Due to the early stages of development, only a few prospective studies have been done for more recently developed biomarkers and limited meta-analyses are available.Therefore a detailed evaluation of these markers are still required to decide on their clinical use. Conclusion: Advancements of analytical methods in BC has driven the research towards non-invasive liquid-based biomarkers in adjunct to urine cytology. Further large prospective studies are required to determine its feasibility in a clinical setting as they are not effective when used in isolation as they have their limitation. With the ongoing pandemic, other than reduction in costs and increased accuracy, the need for biomarkers to cope with delay in cystoscopies in diagnosis and surveillance is crucial. Thus clinical trials with direct comparison is required to improve patient care.
Keywords: biomarker; bladder cancer; cancer screening; non-muscular invasive bladder cancer; surveillance.
Copyright © 2021 Sugeeta, Sharma, Ng, Nayak and Vasdev.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Urinary biomarkers in bladder cancer: A review of the current landscape and future directions.Urol Oncol. 2021 Jan;39(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32919875 Review.
-
Can urinary biomarkers replace cystoscopy?World J Urol. 2019 Sep;37(9):1741-1749. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2505-2. Epub 2018 Oct 3. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30283995 Review.
-
Follow-up in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer-International Bladder Cancer Network recommendations.Urol Oncol. 2016 Oct;34(10):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.028. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Urol Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27368880 Review.
-
Urinary markers in the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. A literature review.Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Oct;43(8):404-413. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 May 13. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019. PMID: 31097210 Review. English, Spanish.
-
Novel urinary biomarkers ADXBLADDER and bladder EpiCheck for diagnostics of bladder cancer: A review.Urol Oncol. 2021 Mar;39(3):161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 26. Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33376063 Review.
Cited by
-
Active Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, the Potential Role of Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 12;31(4):2201-2220. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040163. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38668066 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine: 10 years of clinical evidence in cancer.Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4(1):102-138. doi: 10.37349/etat.2023.00125. Epub 2023 Feb 28. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023. PMID: 36937316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identification of hub genes associated with bladder cancer using bioinformatic analyses.Transl Cancer Res. 2022 May;11(5):1330-1343. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1004. Transl Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35706790 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Markers for Bladder Cancer Screening: An Insight into Bladder Cancer and FDA-Approved Biomarkers.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 21;24(18):14374. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814374. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37762677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Diagnostic and predictive markers in urinary tract cytology].Pathologe. 2022 Mar;43(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s00292-022-01053-9. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Pathologe. 2022. PMID: 35133495 Free PMC article. Review. German.
References
-
- Cambier S, Sylvester RJ, Collette L, Gontero P, Brausi MA, Van Andel G, et al. . EORTC nomograms and risk groups for predicting recurrence, progression, and disease-specific and overall survival in non–muscle-invasive stage Ta–T1 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with 1–3 years of maintenance bacillus calmette-guérin. Eur Urol. (2016) 69:60–9. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.045 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Daneshmand S, Patel S, Lotan Y, Pohar K, Trabulsi E, Woods M, et al. . Efficacy and safety of blue light flexible cystoscopy with hexaminolevulinate in the surveillance of bladder cancer: a phase III, comparative, multicenter study. J Urol. (2018) 199:1158–65. 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.096 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous