Assessing cognitive toxicity in early phase trials - What are we missing?
- PMID: 34651364
- DOI: 10.1002/pon.5834
Assessing cognitive toxicity in early phase trials - What are we missing?
Abstract
Objectives: Novel therapies, such as, small protein molecule inhibitors and immunotherapies are first tested clinically in Phase I trials. Moving on to later phase trials and ultimately standard practice. A key aim of these early clinical trials is to define a toxicity profile; however, the emphasis is often on safety. The concern is cognitive toxicity is poorly studied in this context and may be under-reported. The aim of this review is to map evidence of cognitive assessment, toxicity, and confounding factors within reports from Phase I trials and consider putative mechanisms of impairment aligned with mechanisms of novel therapies.
Methods: A scoping review methodology was applied to the search of databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov. A [keyword search was conducted, results screened for duplication then inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. Articles were further screened for relevance; data organised into categories and charted in a tabular format]. Evidence was collated and summarised into a narrative synthesis.
Results: Despite the availability of robust ways to assess cognitive function, these are not routinely included in the conduct of early clinical trials. Reports of cognitive toxicity in early Phase I trials are limited and available evidence on this shows that a proportion of patients experience impaired cognitive function over the course of participating in a Phase I trial. Links are identified between the targeted action of some novel therapies and putative mechanisms of cognitive impairment.
Conclusion: The review provides rationale for research investigating cognitive function in this context. A study exploring the cognitive function of patients on Phase I trials and the feasibility of formally assessing this within early clinical trials is currently underway at the Royal Marsden.
Keywords: anti-cancer therapies; attention; cancer; clinical trial phase I; cognitive dysfunction; drug development; immunotherapies; memory; oncology; pi3 kinase; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors; psycho-oncology.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Meyers. C. Perry. J. Chapter 1 Cognition and the Brain. New York: Cognition and Cancer University Cambridge Press; 2008.
-
- Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer and cancer treatment-associated change: an update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(30):3675-3686. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0116
-
- Janelisins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011;38(3):431-438. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014
-
- Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, Macdonald BC, Li Y Furstenberg CT, Hanscom BS, Kaufman PA. Longitudinal assessment of cognitive changes associated with adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: impact of age and cognitive reserve. J Clin oncology. 2010;28(29):4434-4436. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0827
-
- Biglia N, Bounous VE, Malabaila A, et al. Objective and self-reported cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer women treated with chemotherapy: a prospective study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
