Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;31(3):405-415.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5834. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Assessing cognitive toxicity in early phase trials - What are we missing?

Affiliations
Review

Assessing cognitive toxicity in early phase trials - What are we missing?

Sarah E Stapleton et al. Psychooncology. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Novel therapies, such as, small protein molecule inhibitors and immunotherapies are first tested clinically in Phase I trials. Moving on to later phase trials and ultimately standard practice. A key aim of these early clinical trials is to define a toxicity profile; however, the emphasis is often on safety. The concern is cognitive toxicity is poorly studied in this context and may be under-reported. The aim of this review is to map evidence of cognitive assessment, toxicity, and confounding factors within reports from Phase I trials and consider putative mechanisms of impairment aligned with mechanisms of novel therapies.

Methods: A scoping review methodology was applied to the search of databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov. A [keyword search was conducted, results screened for duplication then inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. Articles were further screened for relevance; data organised into categories and charted in a tabular format]. Evidence was collated and summarised into a narrative synthesis.

Results: Despite the availability of robust ways to assess cognitive function, these are not routinely included in the conduct of early clinical trials. Reports of cognitive toxicity in early Phase I trials are limited and available evidence on this shows that a proportion of patients experience impaired cognitive function over the course of participating in a Phase I trial. Links are identified between the targeted action of some novel therapies and putative mechanisms of cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: The review provides rationale for research investigating cognitive function in this context. A study exploring the cognitive function of patients on Phase I trials and the feasibility of formally assessing this within early clinical trials is currently underway at the Royal Marsden.

Keywords: anti-cancer therapies; attention; cancer; clinical trial phase I; cognitive dysfunction; drug development; immunotherapies; memory; oncology; pi3 kinase; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors; psycho-oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Meyers. C. Perry. J. Chapter 1 Cognition and the Brain. New York: Cognition and Cancer University Cambridge Press; 2008.
    1. Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer and cancer treatment-associated change: an update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(30):3675-3686. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0116
    1. Janelisins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011;38(3):431-438. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014
    1. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, Macdonald BC, Li Y Furstenberg CT, Hanscom BS, Kaufman PA. Longitudinal assessment of cognitive changes associated with adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: impact of age and cognitive reserve. J Clin oncology. 2010;28(29):4434-4436. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0827
    1. Biglia N, Bounous VE, Malabaila A, et al. Objective and self-reported cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer women treated with chemotherapy: a prospective study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources