South Africa's contribution of insect records on the BOLD system
- PMID: 34652616
- DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06822-y
South Africa's contribution of insect records on the BOLD system
Abstract
South Africa is the third most biodiverse country in the world and insects represent a large part of its faunal diversity, as is seen globally. With more than 65,000 described animal species in South Africa, insects represent 44,088 species. While there are still a lot of species yet to be identified, progress may be hindered by the few insect taxonomists available in South Africa and subsequently, the time-consuming nature and costs of the methods used during species identification. DNA barcoding, on the other hand, has become a valuable tool for documenting biodiversity with the use of a small DNA fragment such as cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI). This paper aims to assess South Africa's contribution to the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) as well as highlight the regions that are under-represented on BOLD. From the 4,984,215 Insecta records on BOLD, South Africa contributed 56,392 insect records, with only 16.85% of that total identified to species level. The Gauteng Province had the most represented insect samples submitted to BOLD with 63.57% followed by Kwazulu-Natal (15.74%), and Mpumalanga (5.73%). However, the Free State, Limpopo, and the Northern Cape provinces are all under-represented on BOLD. This is evident as both the Northern Cape and Limpopo provinces contain one or more biodiversity hotspots which in turn displays the high levels of biodiversity that could still be recorded on BOLD. Improving our understanding with regards to DNA barcoding data linked to geographical regions, as well as specific insect groups, can highlight the areas in need of more research.
Keywords: BOLD; Biodiversity; COI; Insect; South Africa.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos F, Habel J (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–22 - DOI
-
- Samways MJ (1993) Insects in biodiversity conservation: some perspectives and directives. Biodivers Conserv 2:258–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056672 - DOI
-
- McGeoch MA (2007) Insects and bioindication: theory and progress. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology: proceedings of the royal entomological society’s 23rd symposium, Wallingford, pp 144–174
-
- Gerlach J, Samways M, Pryke J (2013) Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv 17:831–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9565-9 - DOI
-
- Azam I, Afsheen S, Zia A, Javed M, Saeed R, Sarwar MK, Munir B (2015) Evaluating insects as bioindicators of heavy metal contamination and accumulation near industrial area of Gujrat, Pakistan. BioMed Res Int 2015:1–11 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
