Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0258655.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258655. eCollection 2021.

Differential STAT gene expressions of Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii in response to white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and bacterial infections: Additional insight into genetic variations and transcriptomic highlights

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differential STAT gene expressions of Penaeus monodon and Macrobrachium rosenbergii in response to white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and bacterial infections: Additional insight into genetic variations and transcriptomic highlights

Tze Chiew Christie Soo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Diseases have remained the major issue for shrimp aquaculture industry for decades by which different shrimp species demonstrated alternative disease resistance or tolerance. However, there had been insufficient studies on the underlying host mechanisms of such phenomenon. Hence, in this study, the main objective involves gaining a deeper understanding into the functional importance of shrimp STAT gene from the aspects of expression, sequence, structure, and associated genes. STAT gene was selected primarily because of its vital signalling roles in stress, endocrine, and immune response. The differential gene expressions of Macrobrachium rosenbergii STAT (MrST) and Penaeus monodon STAT (PmST) under White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus/VpAHPND infections were identified through qPCR analysis. Notably, during both pathogenic infections, MrST demonstrated significant gene expression down-regulations (during either early or later post-infection time points) whereas PmST showed only significant gene expression up-regulations. Important sequence conservation or divergence was highlighted through STAT sequence comparison especially amino acid alterations at 614 aa [K (Lysine) to E (Glutamic Acid)] and 629 aa [F (Phenylalanine) to V (Valine)] from PmST (AY327491.1) to PmST (disease tolerant strain). There were significant differences observed between in silico characterized structures of MrST and PmST proteins. Important functional differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the aspects of stress, endocrine, immune, signalling, and structural were uncovered through comparative transcriptomic analysis. The DEGs associated with STAT functioning were identified including inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, hsp90, caspase, ATP binding cassette transmembrane transporter, C-type Lectin, HMGB, ALF1, ALF3, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and TBK1. The main findings of this study are STAT differential gene expression patterns, sequence divergence, structural differences, and associated functional DEGs. These findings can be further utilized for shrimp health or host response diagnostic studies. STAT gene can also be proposed as a suitable candidate for future studies of shrimp innate immune enhancement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exists.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Comparative gene expression fold change of MrST and PmST against time post-infection (hours) (WSSV and V. parahaemolyticus/VpAHPND).
All relative gene expression fold changes were statistically significant (P<0.05). The error bars indicated standard deviations of the data. [MrST (WSSV) Fold changes: 0 hpi: -1.113; 3 hpi: -2.332; 6 hpi: -4.699; 12 hpi: -2.038; 24 hpi: 2.287; 48 hpi: 2.017]. [PmST (WSSV) Fold changes: 0 hpi: 1.650; 3 hpi: 1.500; 6 hpi: 1.729; 12 hpi: 7.082; 24 hpi: 10.691; 48 hpi: 2.510]. [MrST (V. parahaemolyticus) Fold changes: 0 hpi: 1.238; 3 hpi: 2.272; 6 hpi: -1.766; 12 hpi: -3.262; 24 hpi: -5.429; 48 hpi: -1.125]. [PmST (VpAHPND) Fold changes: 0 hpi: 1.622; 3 hpi: 3.059; 6 hpi: 2.500; 12 hpi: 2.298; 24 hpi: 3.139; 48 hpi: 1.273].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Sequence comparison of MrST, LvST, PmST (New) (disease tolerant strain), and PmST (Accession number: AY327491.1) translated amino acid sequences.
* represents common conserved sites between all sequences. formula image represents important long conserved overlaps between all sequences. formula image represents important divergent sites between PmST (cross-bred disease tolerant strain) and PmST (Accession number: AY327491.1). formula image represents important divergent sites between MrST and other STAT sequences. formula image represents important amino acid addition or deletion between MrST and other STAT sequences.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Overall comparison of important DEGs involving type of DEGs-treatment group and number of DEGs.
Treatment Groups: WM: WSSV-infected M. rosenbergii; VM: V. parahaemolyticus-infected M. rosenbergii; WP: WSSV-infected P. monodon at 12 dpi; AP: VpAHPND-infected P. monodon. Stress DEGs: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, Dopamine N-acetyltransferase, Hsp90, Apoptosis-stimulating of p53 protein 1, Caspase, Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). Endocrine DEGs: Mitochondrial coenzyme A transporter, ATP binding cassette transmembrane transporter, Trehalose transporter, Polysaccharide lyase, Trypsin, Peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase. Immune DEGs: Transglutaminase, C-type Lectin, HMGB, ALF1, ALF3, proPO, Superoxide Dismutase, Glutathione Peroxidase, Catalase. Signalling DEGs: Ceramide synthase, Calcium-activated chloride channel regulator, Inward rectifier potassium channel, STAT, IMD, TBK1. Structural DEGs: Actin, Ankyrin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dastidar PG, Mallik A, Mandal N. Contribution of shrimp disease research to the development of the shrimp aquaculture industry: an analysis of the research and innovation structure across the countries. Scientometrics. 2013;97(3): 659–674.
    1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO; 2020.
    1. Anderson JL, Valderrama D, Jory D. Shrimp production review. Global Aquaculture Alliance: Presentation Global Aquaculture Production Data and Analysis [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 April 9]. https://www.aquaculturealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Global-Sh....
    1. Thitamadee S, Prachumwat A, Srisala J, Jaroenlak P, Salachan PV, Sritunyalucksana K, et al. Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp in Asia. Aquaculture. 2016;452: 69–87.
    1. Ganjoor M. A short review on infectious viruses in cultural shrimps (Penaeidae family). J Fishscicom. 2015;9(3): 9–33.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances