Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;407(2):769-778.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02352-0. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

Elevated CEA with negative PET scan on surveillance of colorectal cancers-a role of CEA kinetics

Affiliations

Elevated CEA with negative PET scan on surveillance of colorectal cancers-a role of CEA kinetics

Anand Ebin Thomas et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The management of patients with elevated CEA after curative treatment of colorectal cancers without structural disease is uncertain. The aim was to study the clinical risk factors, CEA thresholds, and kinetics that could predict relapses.

Methods: Retrospective study of colorectal cancers patients that were detected to have an elevated CEA (> 5 ng/ml on 2 separate occasions) and normal clinical exam, colonoscopy, and positron emission tomography (PET). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoff for absolute CEA values and proportional rise that could predict recurrences.

Results: 162 patients were followed for a median of 42 months. 32 patients (19.7%) relapsed of which 11 (34.4%) had a peritoneal disease. Besides known clinical risk factors, higher CEA at the time of negative PET and rising CEA trend predicted disease recurrence on multivariate logistic regression. CEA threshold of 10.05 ng/ml provided a sensitivity/specificity of 53%/86.2%, while CEA velocity of 1.36 ng/ml over 3 months presented a sensitivity/specificity of 80%/70.6% for subsequent relapse.

Conclusions: The discriminatory value of CEA kinetics was more than that of a single absolute value. An algorithm for managing these patients based on clinical risk factors, absolute CEA value, and its kinetics is suggested.

Keywords: CEA; Colorectal cancer; PET.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gold P, Freedman SO (1965) Specific carcinoembryonic antigens of the human digestive system. J Exp Med 122:467–481. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.122.3.467 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Gold P, Freedman SO (1965) Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med 121:439–462. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.121.3.439 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Benson AB, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, et al (2020) NCCN Guidelines version 1.2021 colon cancer continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures
    1. Huang Y-Y, Lee P-I, Liu M-C, Chen C-C, Huang K-C, Huang AT (2015) A general cutoff level combined with personalized dynamic change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen can suggest timely use of FDG PET for early detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. Clin Nucl Med 40:e465-469. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000900 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicholson BD, Shinkins B, Pathiraja I, Roberts NW, James TJ, Mallett S et al (2015) Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD011134. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011134.pub2

Substances

LinkOut - more resources