What do people find most meaningful? How representations of the self and the world provide meaning in life
- PMID: 34655471
- DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12682
What do people find most meaningful? How representations of the self and the world provide meaning in life
Abstract
Objective: Recent theories propose that global meaning in life (MIL) is based on feelings of coherence, purpose, and existential mattering. MIL has also been linked to mental representations-for example, beliefs, values, attitudes, and identities-that serve as "meaning frameworks" for interpreting the world and oneself. Combining these proposals, we predicted that beliefs, values, attitudes, and identities would foster a sense of MIL to the extent that they provide feelings of coherence, purpose, and existential mattering.
Method: Using multilevel path analysis, we tested within-person associations of coherence, purpose, and existential mattering with a sense of MIL across three studies (Study 1:208 US MTurk workers; Study 2:106 UK university students; Study 3:296 from a UK nationally representative Prolific sample). We explored the generality of these associations across mental representation types and individual differences.
Results: Participants derived greater MIL most strongly from mental representations that provided sense of purpose, followed by existential mattering. Sense of coherence was less robustly related to MIL across mental representation types and religious orientation.
Conclusions: Integrating prior theorizing on MIL, we conclude that mental representations function as "meaning frameworks" to the extent that they provide feelings of purpose, mattering, and, sometimes, coherence.
Keywords: coherence; existential mattering; meaning frameworks; meaning in life; purpose.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
-
- Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
-
- Bergner, R. M., & Ramon, A. (2013). Some implications of beliefs in altruism, free will, and nonreductionism. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 598-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.798249
-
- Burnham, M. J., Le, Y. K., & Piedmont, R. L. (2018). Who is Mturk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21, 934-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394
-
- Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 36, 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
