Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 16;29(1):151.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00966-3.

The development of emergency medical services benefit score: a European Delphi study

Anssi Heino  1   2 , Lasse Raatiniemi #  3 , Timo Iirola #  4   5 , Merja Meriläinen  6 , Janne Liisanantti  7 , Miretta Tommila  8   4 ; Collaboration Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

The development of emergency medical services benefit score: a European Delphi study

Anssi Heino et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The helicopter emergency services (HEMS) Benefit Score (HBS) is a nine-level scoring system developed to evaluate the benefits of HEMS missions. The HBS has been in clinical use for two decades in its original form. Advances in prehospital care, however, have produced demand for a revision of the HBS. Therefore, we developed the emergency medical services (EMS) Benefit Score (EBS) based on the former HBS. As reflected by its name, the aim of the EBS is to measure the benefits produced by the whole EMS systems to patients.

Methods: This is a four-round, web-based, international Delphi consensus study with a consensus definition made by experts from seven countries. Participants reviewed items of the revised HBS on a 5-point Likert scale. A content validity index (CVI) was calculated, and agreement was defined as a 70% CVI. Study included experts from seven European countries. Of these, 18 were prehospital expert panellists and 11 were in-hospital commentary board members.

Results: The first Delphi round resulted in 1248 intervention examples divided into ten diagnostic categories. After removing overlapping examples, 413 interventions were included in the second Delphi round, which resulted in 38 examples divided into HBS categories 3-8. In the third Delphi round, these resulted in 37 prehospital interventions, examples of which were given revised version of the score. In the fourth and final Delphi round, the expert panel was given an opportunity to accept or comment on the revised scoring system.

Conclusions: The former HBS was revised by a Delphi methodology and EBS developed to represent its structural purpose better. The EBS includes 37 exemplar prehospital interventions to guide its clinical use. Trial registration The study permission was requested and granted by Turku University Hospital (decision number TP2/010/18).

Keywords: Delphi method; Emergency medical services; Prehospital; Quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The course of the Delphi rounds in the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Murphy A, Wakai A, Walsh C, et al. Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:286–292. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204793. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saviluoto A, Björkman J, Olkinuora A, et al. The first seven years of nationally organized helicopter emergency medical services in Finland—the data from quality registry. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLean SA, Maio RF, Spaite DW, et al. Emergency medical services outcomes research: evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;6(sup 2):S52–S56. - PubMed
    1. Raatiniemi L, Mikkelsen K, Fredriksen K, et al. Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(10):1253–1259. doi: 10.1111/aas.12208. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raatiniemi L, Liisanantti J, Tommila M, et al. Evaluating helicopter emergency medical missions: a reliability study of the HEMS benefit and NACA scores. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:557–565. doi: 10.1111/aas.12881. - DOI - PubMed