Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan-Dec:27:10760296211048897.
doi: 10.1177/10760296211048897.

How to Achieve Standardization? Diluted Russell Viper Venom Test for Lupus Anticoagulant Detection in a Chinese Female Population

Feng Lu  1   2 , Qingkai Dai  1   2 , Yuefang Wang  1   2 , Xia Zhang  1   2 , Ge Zhang  1   2
Affiliations

How to Achieve Standardization? Diluted Russell Viper Venom Test for Lupus Anticoagulant Detection in a Chinese Female Population

Feng Lu et al. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

On an international scale, guidelines and proposals for lupus anticoagulant detection have been published over the last 20 years, but until now, standardization has not been completely realized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different ways of interpreting the results of lupus anticoagulant detection for standardization. A retrospective review of 15 447 instances of lupus anticoagulant detection by the diluted Russell Viper Venom test for female patients presenting with problems relating to the areas of reproduction, gynecology and obstetrics was performed. Lupus anticoagulant data were compared between different departments, months, reagent lots and cutoffs. Significant differences were found in patient data between different reagent lots, especially between lots of screening reagents (monthly average: highest 37.96 s vs lowest 33.88 s) and in the positive rates of lupus anticoagulant by different detection cutoffs (47.58% by using LA1/LA2 > 1.20 without normalization as a cutoff in Lot 1 vs 1.52% by using LA1 > 44 s as a cutoff in Lot 3). Compared with the cutoff using the value above the 99th percentile of LA1 for the healthy donors per lot, the cutoff using integrated tests with normalization had the smaller deviation of positive rate between different reagent lots. Pregnant women had higher LA1/LA2 levels than nonpregnant women. Based on the results, normalization is needed because there are significant lot-to-lot variations. Integrated tests with normalization might be a better standard by which to confirm lupus anticoagulant. Pregnant women should have population-specific cutoffs because they have higher LA1/LA2 levels.

Keywords: coagulation; gynecology; lupus anticoagulant; obstetrics; reproduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Monthly LA1 and LA2 patient data.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
LA1 and LA2 patient data by lot.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Positive rates of LA for the different groups.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Monthly LA1 and LA2 patient data for the different groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Brandt JT, Triplett DA, Alving B, Scharrer I. Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the subcommittee on lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibody of the scientific and standardisation committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemostasis. 1995;74(4):1185-1190. - PubMed
    1. Giannakopoulos B, Passam F, Ioannou Y, Krilis SA. How we diagnose the antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood. 2009;113(5):985-994. - PubMed
    1. Favaloro EJ. The Russell viper venom time (RVVT) test for investigation of lupus anticoagulant (LA). Am J Hematol. 2019;94(11):1290-1296. - PubMed
    1. Galli M, Barbui T. Antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy. La Tunisie médicale. 2003;83(2):1-5.
    1. Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber Get al. et al. Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2009;7(10):1737-1740. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources