Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;39(7):762-771.
doi: 10.1177/10499091211048767. Epub 2021 Oct 17.

Symptom Prevalence and Place of Death Preference in Advanced Cancer Patients: Factors Associated With the Achievement of Home Death

Julia Fee Voon Ho  1 , Nur Syafiqah Marzuki  1 , Nur Syuhadah Monica Meseng  1 , Viknaswary Kaneisan  1 , Yin Khek Lum  1 , Eunice Wan Wen Pui  2 , Hayati Yaakup  1
Affiliations

Symptom Prevalence and Place of Death Preference in Advanced Cancer Patients: Factors Associated With the Achievement of Home Death

Julia Fee Voon Ho et al. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Achievement of patients' preferred place of death is recognized as a component of a good death. This study aimed to investigate the symptom burden in advanced cancer patients, achievement of their place of death preferences and factors associated with home death.

Methods: In this retrospective review of 287 patient deaths, we examined patients' symptom prevalence, preferred and actual place of death and achievement of their place of death preferences using descriptive statistics. Associations between patient factors, home death preference and actual home death were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: The most prevalent symptoms were weakness, pain and poor appetite, with a mean of 5.77(SD: 2.37) symptoms per patient. The median interval from palliative care referral to death was 21 (IQR: 74) days. Of the 253 patients with documented place of death preference, 132 (52.1%) preferred home death, 111(43.9%) preferred hospital death, 1 (0.4%) preferred to die at a temple and 9(3.6%) expressed no preference. Overall, 221 of 241(91.7%) patients with known actual place of death achieved their preference. Older patients were more likely to prefer home death (OR 1.021; 95% CI 1.004-1.039, p = 0.018) and die at home (OR 1.023; 95% CI 1.005-1.041, p = 0.014). Gender, marital status, cancer diagnosis and symptoms were not associated with preference for or actual home death.

Conclusion: Despite a high symptom burden, most patients preferred and achieved a home death. Late palliative care referral and difficult symptom management contributed to failure to fulfill home death preference. Preference for home death should be considered when managing terminally ill geriatric patients.

Keywords: cancer; geriatrics; home death; palliative care; place of death preference; symptom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of cancer diagnoses in patients who passed away under the care of the palliative care unit (n = 287). *Three patients had 2 concurrent tumors, 1 had 3 concurrent malignancies. GIST indicates gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Indications for palliative care referral. *There was incomplete data for 6 patients, thus these patients were excluded from analysis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Symptom prevalence observed at first palliative care consultation. *Six patients were excluded due to incomplete data on symptom prevalence.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison between preferred and actual place of death and achievement of preferred place of death. (a) 34 of 287 patients were excluded (9 patients were lost to follow-up, 13 were transferred to another center, and 12 deteriorated acutely before preferences regarding place of death could be established). (b) 9 of 253 patients who expressed no preference for place of death were excluded. (c) 12 of 253 patients were excluded (9 patients with no preference for place of death, and 3 who were lost to follow-up).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy—Promoting High Quality Care of All Adults at the End of Life. Department of Health; 2008.
    1. Meier EA, Gallegos JV, Thomas LP, Depp CA, Irwin SA, Jeste DV. Defining a good death (successful dying): literature review and a call for research and public dialogue. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;24(4):261–271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron J, Parkes CM. Terminal care: evaluation of effects on surviving family of care before and after bereavement. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59(688):73–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brogaard T, Neergaard MA, Sokolowski I, Olesen F, Jensen AB. Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2013;27(2):155–164. - PubMed
    1. Hunt KJ, Shlomo N, Addington-Hall J. End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire. Palliat Med. 2014;28(5):412–421. - PubMed