The automated pancreas: A review of technologies and clinical practice
- PMID: 34658126
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.14576
The automated pancreas: A review of technologies and clinical practice
Abstract
Insulin pumps and glucose sensors are effective in improving diabetes therapy and reducing acute complications. The combination of both devices using an algorithm-driven interoperable controller makes automated insulin delivery (AID) systems possible. Many AID systems have been tested in clinical trials and have proven safety and effectiveness. However, currently, none of these systems are available for routine use in children younger than 6 years in Europe. For continued use, both users and prescribers must have sound knowledge of the features of the individual AID systems. Presently, all systems require various user interactions (e.g. meal announcements) because fully automated systems are not yet developed. Open-source systems are non-regulated variants to circumvent existing regulatory conditions. There are risks here for both users and prescribers. To evaluate AID therapy, the metric data of the glucose sensors, 'time in target range' and 'glucose management index', are novel recognized and suitable parameters allowing a consultation based on real glucose and insulin pump download data from the daily life of people with diabetes. Read out via cloud-based software or automatic download of such individual treatment data provides the ideal technical basis for shared decision-making through telemedicine, which must be further evaluated for general use.
Keywords: HCL; artificial pancreas; automated delivery; closed loop; insulin; insulin AID.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cherubini V, Grimsmann JM, Akesson K, et al. Temporal trends in diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of paediatric type 1 diabetes between 2006 and 2016: results from 13 countries in three continents. Diabetologia. 2020;63(8):1530-1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05152-1
-
- Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989-2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(3):408-417.
-
- Karges B, Rosenbauer J, Kapellen T, et al. Hemoglobin A1c levels and risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes from Germany and Austria: a trend analysis in a cohort of 37,539 patients between 1995 and 2012. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10):e1001742.
-
- Addala A, Zaharieva DP, Gu AJ, et al. Clinically serious hypoglycemia is rare and not associated with time-in-range in youth with new-onset type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(11):3239-3247. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab522
-
- DiMeglio LA, Acerini CL, Codner E, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:105-114.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical