Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 8;13(9):e17813.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.17813. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Polyethylene Glycol Versus Senna for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: Updated Evidence by a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Polyethylene Glycol Versus Senna for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Children: Updated Evidence by a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jun Watanabe et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

For colonoscopy, bowel preparation, especially that using polyethylene glycol (PEG) or senna, is performed among children with gastrointestinal disorders; however, it is not fully grounded in evidence. This study reviewed via meta-analyses the approaches to bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. Electronic databases and trial registries were searched until April 2021. Quality assessment was conducted using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. In total, three randomized controlled trials (318 patients) were identified. PEG was observed as a preferred protocol of bowel preparation compared with senna (risk ratio [RR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.74; I2 = 15%). It was less painful than senna (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87; I2 = 0%). No serious adverse events were noted. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate. PEG might be a preferred preparation agent for colonoscopy in children. Given the limited data, more studies are recommended.

Keywords: child nursing; colon disease; pediatric practice; polyethylene glycol; senna.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of the article search
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of preferred bowel preparation
CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot of abdominal pain
CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Prespecified sensitivity analyses
CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Correct analysis of preferred bowel preparation in excluding studies with a high risk of bias
CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Correct analysis of abdominal pain in excluding studies with a high risk of bias
CI, confidence interval; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.

References

    1. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy: report of the NASPGHAN endoscopy and procedures committee. Pall H, Zacur GM, Kramer RE, et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:409–416. - PubMed
    1. Juvenile polyps and juvenile polyp syndromes in children: a clinical and endoscopic survey. Hood B, Bigler S, Bishop P, Liu H, Ahmad N, Renault M, Nowicki M. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2011;50:910–915. - PubMed
    1. Pediatric gastrointestinal bleeding: perspectives from the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology. Romano C, Oliva S, Martellossi S, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1328–1337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome in an adolescent patient. Daniel R, Lieb J 2nd, Pascasio J, Pall H. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2019;58:364–366. - PubMed
    1. Integrated multidisciplinary treatment for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Wren AA, Maddux MH. Children (Basel) 2021;8:169. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources