Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1:9:726769.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.726769. eCollection 2021.

Prophylactic Use of Fluconazole in Very Premature Infants

Affiliations

Prophylactic Use of Fluconazole in Very Premature Infants

Deshuang Zhang et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and fungal sensitivity of prophylactic fluconazole use in very premature infants. Methods: We performed a retrospective historical comparative analysis of 196 very premature infants (113 in the prophylaxis group and 83 in the rescue group). The incidence of nosocomial fungal infection (NCFI) and pathogenic fungi, their drug sensitivity, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluconazole were compared between the two groups. We also analyzed differences in short-term adverse outcomes, such as drug-induced liver or renal function disruption, fungal-attributable death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), between the groups. The effects of the prophylactic fluconazole strategy on NCFI and short-term adverse outcomes were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Results: Candida albicans (46.7%) and Candida glabrata (43.3%) were the main culprit pathogens causing NCFI. The incidence of NCFI was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group than in the rescue group (15.9 vs. 45.8%, P < 0.001). However, fewer fungi were completely sensitive to fluconazole (40 vs. 85%, P < 0.05) and the MIC of fluconazole was higher [16.0 (3.5 ~ 16.0) vs. 3.0 (1.0 ~ 8.0) μg/ml, P < 0.001] in the prophylaxis group than in the rescue group. Compared with the rescue group, the prophylaxis group had a lower risk of NCFI (adjusted OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.11, 0.55). Additionally, the prophylaxis group had significantly lower risks of combined outcomes (one or more complications, such as BPD, ROP needing interventions, PVL/IVH (grade > 2), NEC stage ≥2, and fungal-attributable death) (adjusted OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21, 0.92). There was no significant difference in serum alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), creatinine (Cr), or direct bilirubin (DBIL) levels between the two groups. Conclusions: Fluconazole prophylaxis reduced NCFI and improved combined clinical outcomes in very premature infants, with no increased risks of serious short-term adverse side effects; however, the MIC of fluconazole showed significant increases. Therefore, further optimization of preventive strategies is necessary to maintain the sensitivity of fluconazole against fungal isolates.

Keywords: fluconazole; infant; nosocomial infection; premature; prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The distribution of fungal species between two groups.

References

    1. Zhang DS, Xie DK, He N, Dong WB, Lei XP. [Pathogen distribution, risk factors, and outcomes of nosocomial infection in very premature infants]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. (2017) 19:866–71. 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.08.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pana ZD, Roilides E, Warris A, Groll AH, Zaoutis T. Epidemiology of invasive fungal disease in children. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. (2017) 6:S3–s11. 10.1093/jpids/pix046 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu J, Ding Y, Jiang Y, Mo S, Xu S, Qin P. Persistent candidemia in very low birth weight neonates: risk factors and clinical significance. BMC Infect Dis. (2018) 18:558. 10.1186/s12879-018-3487-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dessì A, Liori B, Caboni P, Corsello G, Giuffrè M, Noto A, et al. Monitoring neonatal fungal infection with metabolomics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2014) 27:34–8. 10.3109/14767058.2014.954787 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2004) 17:638–80. 10.1128/CMR.17.3.638-680.2004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources