Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;48(3):883-907.
doi: 10.1111/jmft.12559. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

Satisfaction or connectivity?: Implications from the strong relationality model of flourishing couple relationships

Adam M Galovan  1 , Jason S Carroll  2 , David G Schramm  3 , Nathan D Leonhardt  4 , Johana Zuluaga  1 , Siobahn E M McKenadel  1 , McKenna R Oleksuik  1
Affiliations

Satisfaction or connectivity?: Implications from the strong relationality model of flourishing couple relationships

Adam M Galovan et al. J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

A central feature of couple relationships research is the use of self-report measures of relationship satisfaction. Despite the widespread use of such measures in couples' research, scholars have raised critical questions about satisfaction-focused assessment, including concerns about taking an ontologically individualistic focus. Moving beyond ontological individualism, drawing from the Strong Relationality Model of Relationship Flourishing and data from 615 couples in the United States and Canada (N = 1230 individuals), we explored similarities and differences between assessments of relationship satisfaction and a measure based on strong relationality (relational-connectivity). We evaluated associations with other scales assessing relationship factors including indicators of well-being, relationship processes, virtues, and responsible actions. Using confirmatory latent profile analysis, we classified individuals as Flourishing (55.4%), Languishing (31.8%), Connected, Less-Satisfied (7.8%), or Satisfied, Less-Connected (5.0%). Our results suggest that attending to richer perspectives of relationship quality may spur additional understanding of many factors associated with meaningful couple relationships.

Keywords: positive psychology; relationship flourishing; relationship quality; relationship satisfaction; responsible actions; virtues.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams, C. R. (1946). The prediction of adjustment in marriage. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316444600600202
    1. Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177-1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177
    1. Amato, P. R. (2007). Studying marriage and commitment with survey data. In S. L. Hofferth & L. M. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 53-65). Erlbaum.
    1. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
    1. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210

LinkOut - more resources