Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 18;11(1):20592.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99859-9.

The influence of the grass mixture composition on the quality and suitability for football pitches

Affiliations

The influence of the grass mixture composition on the quality and suitability for football pitches

Karol Wolski et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The selection of grass mixtures with appropriate visual and functional parameters for sowing football fields is a key element in shaping the sports infrastructure, ensuring the spectacularity of a match and comfort for players. The aim of the research was to investigate the properties of lawn grass mixtures and their suitability for football pitches. The experiment was conducted at the Toya Golf & Country Club (51° 20' E, 17° 07' N), Wrocław, Poland, between 2007 and 2009. 12 grass mixtures were selected, mainly based on red fescue, Kentucky bluegrass, and perennial ryegrass. The assessment was carried out using a nine-point scale, according to the Plant Variety Office methodology for crops and turf grass. Six features of sports turf were studied: appearance, density, colour, leaf fineness, overwintering, and susceptibility to disease and they significantly varied, depending on the grass mixture and the year of research. Our study showed that mixtures based on the dominance of meadow grass were characterized by higher values of the general visual aspect, colour and slenderness of the leaf blade and these based on the dominance of perennial ryegrass and co-dominance of perennial ryegrass and meadow grass were the most useful in terms of wintering, resistance to diseases and sodding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ratings of pitch overall aspect across grass mixtures and research years.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ratings of pitch density across grass mixtures and research years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ratings of pitch colour across grass mixtures and research years in different seasons.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ratings of leaf fineness across grass mixtures and research years.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ratings of susceptibility to diseases across grass mixtures and research years.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Ratings of winter survival across grass mixtures and research years.

References

    1. Pornaro C, Barolo E, Rimi F, Macolino S, Richardson M. Performance of various cool-season turfgrasses as influenced by simulated traffic in northeastern Italy. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2016;81:1611–4434. doi: 10.17660/eJHS.2016/81.1.4. - DOI
    1. The influence of various lawn grasses mixture and sowing rate on the sport turf quality indicator. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173238417.
    1. Samaranayake H, Lawson TJ, Murphy JA. Traffic stress effects on bentgrass putting green and fairway turf. Crop Sci. 2008;48:1193. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.09.0613. - DOI
    1. Domański, P. J. Wydz. Inżynierii i Kształtowania Środowiska SGGW Scientific Rev. Eng. Environ. Sci. SGGW (2002).
    1. Suitability of turfgrass species, varieties and mixtures for turfing football grounds. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PL2009001271.