Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec:4:100086.
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100086. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Punt Politics as Failure of Health System Stewardship: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Brazil and Mexico

Felicia Marie Knaul  1   2   3   4 , Michael Touchton  1   5 , Héctor Arreola-Ornelas  1   3   4 , Rifat Atun  6 , Renzo Jc Calderon Anyosa  1   7   8 , Julio Frenk  9 , Adolfo Martínez-Valle  1   10 , Tim McDonald  1   11 , Thalia Porteny  12 , Mariano Sánchez-Talanquer  13 , Cesar Victora  14
Affiliations
Review

Punt Politics as Failure of Health System Stewardship: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Brazil and Mexico

Felicia Marie Knaul et al. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

We present a new concept, Punt Politics, and apply it to the COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in two epicenters of the pandemic: Mexico and Brazil. Punt Politics refers to national leaders in federal systems deferring or deflecting responsibility for health systems decision-making to sub-national entities without evidence or coordination. The fragmentation of authority and overlapping functions in federal, decentralized political systems make them more susceptible to coordination problems than centralized, unitary systems. We apply the concept to pandemics, which require national health system stewardship, using sub-national NPI data that we developed and curated through the Observatory for the Containment of COVID-19 in the Americas to illustrate Punt Politics in Mexico and Brazil. Both countries suffer from protracted, high levels of COVID-19 mortality and inadequate pandemic responses, including little testing and disregard for scientific evidence. We illustrate how populist leadership drove Punt Politics and how partisan politics contributed to disabling an evidence-based response in Mexico and Brazil. These cases illustrate the combination of decentralization and populist leadership that is most conducive to punting responsibility. We discuss how Punt Politics reduces health system functionality, providing lessons for other countries and future pandemic responses, including vaccine rollout.

Keywords: Brazil; Covid-19; Health Systems; Mexico; Stewardship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Frenk J. The global health system: strengthening national health systems as the next step for global progress. PLoS Med. 2010;7(1) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rocha R, Atun R, Massuda A, et al. Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and vulnerabilities on health system preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00081-4. published online April 12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Talanquer M, González-Pier E, Sepúlveda J, Abascal-Miguel L, Fieldhouse J, Del Rio C, Gallalee S. Mexico's Response to Covid-19: A Case Study. UCSF Institute for Global Health Sciences. 2021. https://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/sites/globalhealthsciences.ucsf.ed... (accessed April 13, 2021).
    1. Jamison DT, Frenk J, Knaul F. International collective action in health: objectives, functions, and rationale. The Lancet. 1998;351(9101):514–517. - PubMed
    1. Touchton M, Knaul FM, Arreola-Ornelas H, Porteny T, Sánchez M, Méndez O, et al. A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil. BMJ global health. 2021;6(6) - PMC - PubMed