Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Dec 21;42(48):4918-4929.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab568.

Prognostic value of comprehensive intracoronary physiology assessment early after heart transplantation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic value of comprehensive intracoronary physiology assessment early after heart transplantation

Jung-Min Ahn et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated the long-term prognostic value of invasively assessing coronary physiology after heart transplantation in a large multicentre registry.

Methods and results: Comprehensive intracoronary physiology assessment measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR), the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) was performed in 254 patients at baseline (a median of 7.2 weeks) and in 240 patients at 1 year after transplantation (199 patients had both baseline and 1-year measurement). Patients were classified into those with normal physiology, reduced FFR (FFR ≤ 0.80), and microvascular dysfunction (either IMR ≥ 25 or CFR ≤ 2.0 with FFR > 0.80). The primary outcome was the composite of death or re-transplantation at 10 years. At baseline, 5.5% had reduced FFR; 36.6% had microvascular dysfunction. Baseline reduced FFR [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-6.15; P = 0.088] and microvascular dysfunction (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.79; P = 0.73) were not predictors of death and re-transplantation at 10 years. At 1 year, 5.0% had reduced FFR; 23.8% had microvascular dysfunction. One-year reduced FFR (aHR 2.98, 95% CI 1.13-7.87; P = 0.028) and microvascular dysfunction (aHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.19-4.59; P = 0.015) were associated with significantly increased risk of death or re-transplantation at 10 years. Invasive measures of coronary physiology improved the prognostic performance of clinical variables (χ2 improvement: 7.41, P = 0.006). However, intravascular ultrasound-derived changes in maximal intimal thickness were not predictive of outcomes.

Conclusion: Abnormal coronary physiology 1 year after heart transplantation was common and was a significant predictor of death or re-transplantation at 10 years.

Keywords: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy; Coronary stenosis; Heart transplantation; Microvascular dysfunction; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Abnormal coronary physiology at 1 year after heart transplantation. CRF, coronary flow reserve; FFR, fractional flow reserve; IMR, index of microcirculatory resistance.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of coronary physiological abnormality at baseline (A) and 1 year (B). CRF, coronary flow reserve; FFR, fractional flow reserve; IMR, index of microcirculatory resistance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physiological abnormality at baseline (A) and 1 year (B) and the risk of death and re-transplantation at 10 years. Event rates were derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates and were compared by log-rank test. FFR, fractional flow reserve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in physiological abnormality of Reduced FFR (A) and Microvascular dysfunction (B) between baseline and 1 year and the risk of death and re-transplantation at 10 years. Event rates were derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates and were compared by log-rank test. FFR, fractional flow reserve.

Comment in

References

    1. Lund LH, Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb S, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, Meiser B, Rossano JW, Chambers DC, Yusen RD, Stehlik J; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2017; Focus Theme: allograft ischemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017;36:1037–1046. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal S, Parashar A, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Modi D, Starling RC, Oliveira GH. Long-term mortality after cardiac allograft vasculopathy: implications of percutaneous intervention. JACC Heart Fail 2014;2:281–288. - PubMed
    1. Hiemann NE, Wellnhofer E, Knosalla C, Lehmkuhl HB, Stein J, Hetzer R, Meyer R. Prognostic impact of microvasculopathy on survival after heart transplantation: evidence from 9713 endomyocardial biopsies. Circulation 2007;116:1274–1282. - PubMed
    1. Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, Anderson A, Chan M, Desai S, Fedson S, Fisher P, Gonzales-Stawinski G, Martinelli L, McGiffin D, Smith J, Taylor D, Meiser B, Webber S, Baran D, Carboni M, Dengler T, Feldman D, Frigerio M, Kfoury A, Kim D, Kobashigawa J, Shullo M, Stehlik J, Teuteberg J, Uber P, Zuckermann A, Hunt S, Burch M, Bhat G, Canter C, Chinnock R, Crespo-Leiro M, Delgado R, Dobbels F, Grady K, Kao W, Lamour J, Parry G, Patel J, Pini D, Towbin J, Wolfel G, Delgado D, Eisen H, Goldberg L, Hosenpud J, Johnson M, Keogh A, Lewis C, O'Connell J, Rogers J, Ross H, Russell S, Vanhaecke J; International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:914–956. - PubMed
    1. Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A, Ensminger SM, Hiemann NE, Kobashigawa JA, Madsen J, Parameshwar J, Starling RC, Uber PA. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:717–727. - PubMed

Publication types