Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Dec;41(12):1033-1040.
doi: 10.1002/phar.2636. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Comparison of risk-scoring systems for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgery patients

Jackson J Stewart  1 , Ricky Turgeon  2 , Arabesque Parker  3 , Sheri Koshman  4 , Mohamed A Omar  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of risk-scoring systems for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgery patients

Jackson J Stewart et al. Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Several risk-scoring tools have been developed to exclude heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients with thrombocytopenia, but these scores have not been reproduced or compared in the cardiac surgery population. The objective of this study was to validate and compare the modified 4T's (m4T) and Lillo-Le Louet (LLL) scores for HIT screening in the cardiac surgery population.

Methods: In this nested case-control study, we retrospectively calculated the m4T and the cardiac surgery-specific score by LLL for 18 cases (HIT-positive) and 54 matched controls (HIT-negative) using characteristics known at the time the HIT assay was ordered post-cardiac surgery and compared their performances by their c-statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The median time from surgery to HIT assay order was 9.5 days (IQR 3.75-11.0) in the HIT-positive group and 2 days (IQR 2.0-3.0) in the HIT-negative group (p < 0.0001). The c-statistics for the m4T and the LLL scores were 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.51-0.74), respectively (p = 0.051). Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 91% for the m4T, and 94% and 32% for the LLL score.

Conclusion: Performance of the m4T and LLL scores in discriminating HIT-positive from HIT-negative patients was modest among patients post-cardiac surgery. However, differences between the sensitivities of these scores suggest that the LLL score may be a safer tool for ruling out HIT in this population.

Keywords: anticoagulation; cardiopulmonary bypass; heparin; heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; thrombocytopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(6):2121-2131.
    1. Shore-Lesserson L, Baker RA, Ferraris VA, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines∗-anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):650-662.
    1. Crowther MA, Cook DJ, Albert M, et al. The 4Ts scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical-surgical intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(2):287-293.
    1. Fiorenza MA, Frazee EN, Personett HA, Dierkhising RA, Schramm GE. Assessment of a modified 4T scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2014;29(3):426-431.
    1. Lillo-Le Louët A, Boutouyrie P, Alhenc-Gelas M, et al. Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(11):1882-1888.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources