Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 19;18(10):e1003793.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003793. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines

Affiliations

Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines

Simon Pollett et al. PLoS Med. .

Erratum in

  • Correction: Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines.
    Pollett S, Johansson MA, Reich NG, Brett-Major D, Del Valle SY, Venkatramanan S, Lowe R, Porco T, Berry IM, Deshpande A, Kraemer MUG, Blazes DL, Pan-Ngum W, Vespigiani A, Mate SE, Silal SP, Kandula S, Sippy R, Quandelacy TM, Morgan JJ, Ball J, Morton LC, Althouse BM, Pavlin J, van Panhuis W, Riley S, Biggerstaff M, Viboud C, Brady O, Rivers C. Pollett S, et al. PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 17;20(11):e1004316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004316. eCollection 2023 Nov. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37976465 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: The importance of infectious disease epidemic forecasting and prediction research is underscored by decades of communicable disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. Unlike other fields of medical research, such as clinical trials and systematic reviews, no reporting guidelines exist for reporting epidemic forecasting and prediction research despite their utility. We therefore developed the EPIFORGE checklist, a guideline for standardized reporting of epidemic forecasting research.

Methods and findings: We developed this checklist using a best-practice process for development of reporting guidelines, involving a Delphi process and broad consultation with an international panel of infectious disease modelers and model end users. The objectives of these guidelines are to improve the consistency, reproducibility, comparability, and quality of epidemic forecasting reporting. The guidelines are not designed to advise scientists on how to perform epidemic forecasting and prediction research, but rather to serve as a standard for reporting critical methodological details of such studies.

Conclusions: These guidelines have been submitted to the EQUATOR network, in addition to hosting by other dedicated webpages to facilitate feedback and journal endorsement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Lowe R, Stewart-Ibarra AM, Petrova D, García-Díez M, Borbor-Cordova MJ, Mejía R, et al.. Climate services for health: predicting the evolution of the 2016 dengue season in Machala. Ecuador Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1:e142–51. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30064-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johansson MA, Apfeldorf KM, Dobson S, Devita J, Buczak AL, Baugher B, et al.. An open challenge to advance probabilistic forecasting for dengue epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:24268–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909865116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biggerstaff M, Johansson M, Alper D, Brooks LC, Chakraborty P, Farrow DC, et al.. Results from the Second Year of a Collaborative Effort to Forecast Influenza Seasons in the United States. Epidemics. 2018;24:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.02.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrens KA, Hutcheon JA, Gavin L, Moskosky S. Reducing Unintended Pregnancies as a Strategy to Avert Zika-Related Microcephaly Births in the United States: A Simulation Study. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:982–7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2275-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Valle SY, McMahon BH, Asher J, Hatchett R, Lega JC, Brown HE, et al.. Summary results of the 2014–2015 DARPA Chikungunya challenge. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:245. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3124-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types