Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;60(6):959-962.
doi: 10.1055/a-1649-8931. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

[Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin as a salvage regimen after Sofosbuvir + Velpatasvir + Voxilaprevir re-treatment failure]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin as a salvage regimen after Sofosbuvir + Velpatasvir + Voxilaprevir re-treatment failure]

[Article in German]
Tammo L Tergast et al. Z Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) achieves sustained virological response (SVR) in the majority of patients. Even after initial virological failure, re-treatment with the combination of sofosbuvir+velpatasvir+voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) has been established as an effective second line regimen. However, some patients fail to achieve SVR after a second antiviral course with SOF/VEL/VOX. These patients are considered difficult-to-cure. Currently, the optimal regimen for antiviral re-re-treamtent is a matter of debate and European and American guidelines suggest the combination of SOF+glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) + Ribavirin as a salvage regimen. However, there is only little evidence to support this. In this study, data of two patients with genotype 3 chronic HCV infection, liver cirrhosis and virological failure after re-treatment with SOF/VEL/VOX that successfully achieved SVR with the combination of SOF+G/P ± RBV. Importantly, one patient had Child B cirrhosis to the time of treatment initiation. No adverse events were reported. Thus, our data support the use of SOF + G/P + RBV as a salvage regimen after re-treatment failure with SOF/VEL/VOX.

Die antivirale Erstlinientherapie mit direkt antiviral wirkenden Medikamenten (DAA) bei Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis-C-Virus-Infektion (HCV) führt in >90% der Fälle zu einer Ausheilung der Erkrankung. Selbst nach Versagen der Erstlinientherapie gibt es eine etablierte und gut wirksame Behandlungsoption mit Sofosbuvir + Velpatasvir + Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Allerdings gibt es einige Patienten, die selbst nach einer zweiten antiviralen Therapie keine Ausheilung erreichen. Oftmals gibt es Faktoren wie das Vorliegen einer Leberzirrhose oder einer Virusvariante, die mit einem Therapieversagen assoziiert sind. Zurzeit empfehlen europäische und amerikanische Leitlinien den Einsatz von SOF in Kombination mit Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (G/P) + Ribavirin (RBV) als Reservetherapie. Jedoch gibt es derzeit nur unzureichende Evidenz, um die Wirksamkeit bei diesen schwer zu behandelnden Patienten zu bestätigen. Im Folgenden wird über 2 Patienten mit HCV-Infektion (Genotyp 3 mit Y93H-Variante) und Leberzirrhose berichtet, bei denen mit einer Kombination von SOF + G/P ± RBV eine dauerhafte HCV-Ausheilung erzielt werden konnte. Bei einem Patienten lag zum Zeitpunkt des Therapiestarts bereits eine Child-B-Zirrhose vor, es kam zu keinerlei schweren Nebenwirkungen. Diese Daten unterstützen also einen Einsatz von SOF + G/P ± RBV bei Patienten mit Re-Therapieversagen nach SOF/VEL/VOX-Therapie.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NK reports received speaker’s fees from Abbvie. HW reports fees from Abbott, grants and personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Altimmune, grants and personal fees from Biotest, grants and personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Merck/MSD, personal fees from MYR GmbH, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Siemens, and Transgene. MC reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from Merck/MSD, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Novartis, from Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (SOBI), personal fees from Falk Foundation, grants and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. BM has received speaker and/or consulting fees from Abbott Molecular, Astellas, Intercept, Falk, AbbVie, Norgine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fujirebio,Janssen-Cilag, Merck (MSD), Roche and has received research support from Abbott Molecular, Altona Diagnostics, Fujirebio, and Roche. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources