Management strategies for prosthetic joint infection: long-term infection control rates, overall survival rates, functional and quality of life outcomes
- PMID: 34667643
- PMCID: PMC8489477
- DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008
Management strategies for prosthetic joint infection: long-term infection control rates, overall survival rates, functional and quality of life outcomes
Abstract
DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), one-stage and two-stage revision surgery are the most common management strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management. Our knowledge concerning their efficacy is based on short to medium-term low-quality studies.Most studies report infection recurrence rates or infection-free time intervals. However, long-term survival rates of the infection-free joints, functional and quality of life outcome data are of paramount importance.DAIR, one-stage and two-stage revision strategies are not unique surgical techniques, presenting several variables. Infection control rates for the above strategies vary from 75% to 90%, but comparisons are difficult because different indications and patient selection criteria are used in each strategy.Recent outcome data show that DAIR and one-stage revision in selected patients (based on host, bacteriological, soft tissue and type of infection criteria) may present improved functional and quality of life outcomes and reduced costs for health systems as compared to those of two-stage revision.It is expected that health system administrators and providers will apply pressure on surgeons and departments towards the wider use of DAIR and one-stage revision strategies. It is the orthopaedic surgeon's responsibility to conduct quality studies in order to fully clarify the indications and outcomes of the different revision strategies. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:727-734. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210008.
Keywords: PJI clinical outcomes; functional recovery; quality of life.
© 2021 The author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: TK reports consultancy fees paid to his institution by Microport Orthopaedics, for relevant financial activities outside the submitted work. Both authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.
Figures
References
-
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:780–785. - PubMed
-
- Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:105–109. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son MS, Chang ET, Zimmerli W, Parvizi J. Are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection? Trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3238–3245. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
