Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 14;6(9):779-787.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200109. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology

Affiliations
Review

Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology

Roberto Padua et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

This study was designed to identify the most frequent shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reported in high-quality literature.A systematic review was performed to identify shoulder PROMs, and their diffusion within the scientific literature was tested with a subsequent dedicated search in MEDLINE.506 studies were included in the final data analysis, for a total number of 36,553 patients.The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), the American Shoulder, Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were the most frequently reported PROMs in the analysed publications, with disease-specific PROMs being used with increasing frequency.A core set of outcome measures for future studies on patients with shoulder pathologies, based on the international acceptance and diffusion of each PROM, is needed.A combination of the DASH score for shoulder outcome assessment with more specific PROMs, such as the ASES for rotator cuff pathology and osteoarthritis and the SPADI for shoulder stiffness and shoulder pain of unspecified origin, is proposed as a recommended set of PROMs. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:779-787. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200109.

Keywords: outcome measures; patient-reported; shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Frequency distribution of the investigated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among the studies considered. (B) Number of patients analysed with the selected PROMs throughout the studies considered. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about rotator cuff and subacromial pathologies. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about proximal humerus fractures. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about rotator shoulder instability. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about shoulder stiffness. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Frequency of the selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the studies about shoulder pain of unspecified origin. Since more than one PROM can be used in each study, the sum of all percentages is not necessarily 100%. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; SDQ, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Percentage of patient-reported outcome measure diffusion within each pathology category. Note. DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score; SST, Simple Shoulder Test; SPADI, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; OSS, Oxford Shoulder Score; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; WOOS, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder.

References

    1. Mosher ZA, Ewing MA, Collins CS, et al. . Usage trends of patient-reported outcome measures in shoulder literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;October:1. - PubMed
    1. Amadio PC. Outcomes measurements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75-A:1583–1584. - PubMed
    1. Dawson J, Carr A. Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:313–315. - PubMed
    1. Pynsent PB. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:792–794. - PubMed
    1. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–1432. - PubMed