Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;164(5):1347-1355.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05020-w. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Mastication after craniotomy: pilot assessment of postoperative oral health-related quality of life

Affiliations

Mastication after craniotomy: pilot assessment of postoperative oral health-related quality of life

Mortimer Gierthmuehlen et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Neurosurgical approaches to the brain often require the mobilization of the temporal muscle. Many patients complain of postoperative pain, atrophy, reduced mouth opening, and masticatory problems. Although the pterional, frontolateral-extended-pterional, and temporal craniotomies are the most frequently used approaches in neurosurgery, a systematic assessment of the postoperative oral health-related quality of life has never been performed so far. This study evaluates the oral health-related quality of life of patients after pterional, frontolateral-extended-pterional, or temporal craniotomy using a validated and standardized dental questionnaire, compares the results with the normal values of the general population, and investigates whether this questionnaire is sensitive to changes caused by surgical manipulation of the temporal muscle.

Methods: The "Oral Health Impact Profile" (OHIP14) is a validated questionnaire to assess the oral health-related quality of life. It asks the patients to assess their oral health situation within the past 7 days in 14 questions. Possible answers range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Sixty patients with benign intracranial processes operated through a lateral cranial approach were included. The questionnaire was answered before surgery (baseline) and 3 months and 15 months after surgery.

Results: Overall, postoperative OHIP scores increase significantly after 3 months and decrease after 15 months, but not to preoperative values. No factors can be identified which show a considerable relationship with the postoperative OHIP score.

Conclusions: Postoperative impairment of mouth opening and pain during mastication can be observed 3 to 15 months after surgery and sometimes cause feedback from patients and their dentists. However, in line with existing literature, these complaints decrease with time. The study shows that the OHIP questionnaire is sensitive to changes caused by surgical manipulation of the temporal muscle and can therefore be used to investigate the influence of surgical techniques on postoperative complaints. Postoperatively, patients show worse OHIP scores than the general population, demonstrating that neurosurgical cranial approaches negatively influence the patient's oral health-related wellbeing. Larger studies using the OHIP questionnaire should evaluate if postoperative physical therapy, speech therapy, or specialized rehabilitation devices can improve the masticatory impairment after craniotomy.

Trial registration: Clinical trial register: DRKS00011096.

Keywords: Atrophy; Craniotomy; OHIP; QoL; Quality of life; Temporal muscle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of the template in which the surgeons drew incision of the temporal muscle. Template model by BodyParts 3D DBCLS, licensed under CC 2.1 (http://lifesciencedb.jp/bp3d/)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplot of the OHIP scores at baseline, 3 months after surgery, and 15 months after surgery

References

    1. Andrade FCD, Jr, Andrade FCD, Araujo Filho CMD, Carcagnolo Filho J. Dysfunction of the temporalis muscle after pterional craniotomy for intracranial aneurysms: comparative, prospective and randomized study of one flap versus two flaps dieresis. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 1998;56(2):200–205. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X1998000200006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badie B. Cosmetic reconstruction of temporal defect following pterional [corrected] craniotomy. Surg Neurol. 1996;45(4):383–384. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(95)00452-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowles AP. Reconstruction of the temporalis muscle for pterional and cranio-orbital craniotomies. Surg Neurol. 1999;52(5):524–529. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00112-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunori A, DiBenedetto A, Chiappetta F. Transosseous reconstruction of temporalis muscle for pterional craniotomy: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997;40(01):22–23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1053408. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comim LD, Dalla Nora Â, Knorst JK, de O Racki DN, do A Zenkner JE, Alves LS. Traumatic dental injury and oral health–related quality of life among 15 to 19 year old adolescents from Santa Maria Brazil. Dental Traumatology. 2021;37(1):58–64. doi: 10.1111/edt.12594. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources