Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice
- PMID: 34668879
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965
Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice
Abstract
Background: Clinical outcomes following nerve injury repair can be inadequate. Pulsed-current electrical stimulation (ES) is a therapeutic method that facilitates functional recovery by accelerating axon regeneration. However, current clinical ES protocols involve the application of ES for 60 minutes during surgery, which can increase operative complexity and time. Shorter ES protocols could be a strategy to facilitate broader clinical adoption. The purpose of the present study was to determine if a 10-minute ES protocol could improve outcomes.
Methods: C57BL/6J mice were randomized to 3 groups: no ES, 10 minutes of ES, and 60 minutes of ES. In all groups, the sciatic nerve was transected and repaired, and, in the latter 2 groups, ES was applied after repair. Postoperatively, changes to gene expression from dorsal root ganglia were measured after 24 hours. The number of motoneurons regenerating axons was determined by retrograde labeling at 7 days. Histomorphological analyses of the nerve were performed at 14 days. Function was evaluated serially with use of behavioral tests up to 56 days postoperatively, and relative muscle weight was evaluated.
Results: Compared with the no-ES group, both ES groups demonstrated increased regeneration-associated gene expression within dorsal root ganglia. The 10-minute and 60-minute ES groups demonstrated accelerated axon regeneration compared with the no-ES group based on increased numbers of labeled motoneurons regenerating axons (mean difference, 202.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.5 to 386.5] and 219.4 [95% CI, 34.9 to 403.9], respectively) and myelinated axon counts (mean difference, 559.3 [95% CI, 241.1 to 877.5] and 339.4 [95% CI, 21.2 to 657.6], respectively). The 10-minute and 60-minute ES groups had improved behavioral recovery, including on grid-walking analysis, compared with the no-ES group (mean difference, 11.9% [95% CI, 3.8% to 20.0%] and 10.9% [95% CI, 2.9% to 19.0%], respectively). There was no difference between the ES groups in measured outcomes.
Conclusions: A 10-minute ES protocol accelerated axon regeneration and facilitated functional recovery.
Clinical relevance: The brief (10-minute) ES protocol provided similar benefits to the 60-minute protocol in an acute sciatic nerve transection/repair mice model and merits further studies.
Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G615).
Similar articles
-
Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35139047 Free PMC article.
-
Brief Electrical Stimulation Promotes Nerve Regeneration Following Experimental In-Continuity Nerve Injury.Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(1):156-163. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy221. Neurosurgery. 2019. PMID: 29893910
-
Types of Short-Duration Electrical Stimulation-Induced Efficiency in the Axonal Regeneration and Recovery: Comparative in Vivo Study in Rat Model of Repaired Sciatic Nerve and its Tibial Branch after Transection Injury.Neurochem Res. 2024 Sep;49(9):2469-2479. doi: 10.1007/s11064-024-04154-4. Epub 2024 Jun 10. Neurochem Res. 2024. PMID: 38856888
-
Strategies to promote peripheral nerve regeneration: electrical stimulation and/or exercise.Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Feb;43(3):336-50. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13005. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Eur J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26121368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Axon Regeneration After Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Animal Models and Humans.Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Apr;13(2):295-310. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0415-1. Neurotherapeutics. 2016. PMID: 26754579 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Unlocking nerve regeneration: electrical stimulation and bioscaffolds to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.Front Neurosci. 2025 May 16;19:1594435. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1594435. eCollection 2025. Front Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40454247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pilot Study: A Multicenter, Prospective Study Demonstrating Safety, Usability, and Feasibility of Perioperative 1-hour Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 6;13(5):e6729. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006729. eCollection 2025 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 40330163 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the Mechanism of Conditioning Versus Postoperative Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration: One Therapy, Two Distinct Effects.Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jul;72(1):15-33. doi: 10.1002/mus.28385. Epub 2025 Mar 11. Muscle Nerve. 2025. PMID: 40067140 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review to Compare Electrical, Magnetic, and Optogenetic Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Repair.J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Jun 29;6(5):722-739. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.03.005. eCollection 2024 Sep. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024. PMID: 39381397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Applications of advances in therapeutic electrical stimulation techniques and technologies in precision peripheral nerve repair: a narrative review.Adv Technol Neurosci. 2025 Jun;2(2):97-101. doi: 10.4103/atn.atn-d-24-00023. Adv Technol Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40620882 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Padovano WM, Dengler J, Patterson MM, Yee A, Snyder-Warwick AK, Wood MD, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE. Incidence of Nerve Injury After Extremity Trauma in the United States. Hand (N Y). 2020 Oct 21:1558944720963895. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
-
- Ruijs ACJ, Jaquet JB, Kalmijn S, Giele H, Hovius SER. Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):484-1-9, discussion 495-6.
-
- Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:698256. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
-
- Karsy M, Watkins R, Jensen MR, Guan J, Brock AA, Mahan MA. Trends and Cost Analysis of Upper Extremity Nerve Injury Using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e488-1-9. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
-
- Foster CH, Karsy M, Jensen MR, Guan J, Eli I, Mahan MA. Trends and Cost-Analysis of Lower Extremity Nerve Injury Using the National Inpatient Sample. Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):250-1-9.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical