The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter
- PMID: 34669102
- PMCID: PMC9834361
- DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07278-9
The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter
Erratum in
-
Correction to: The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Treatment of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in the Setting of Chronic Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Feb;37(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07286-9. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023. PMID: 34739649 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare effectiveness of different treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were scheduled for cardioversion (CV) or ablation (CA) presenting with left atrium appendage (LAA) thrombus despite chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC).
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 2014-2019 medical records of patients scheduled for CV or CA of AF who were diagnosed with LAA thrombus despite optimal OAC and had a follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). Changes in treatment were divided into the following groups: switch to a drug with different mechanism of action, switch to a drug with similar mechanism of action, initiation of combination therapy, or deliberate no change in treatment. Patients with contraindications to non-vitamin K antagonists were excluded from the analysis.
Results: We analyzed data of 129 patients comprising 181 cycles of treatment. The overall effectiveness of LAA thrombus dissolution was 51.9% regardless of the number of cycles and 42.6% for the first cycle of treatment. Any change of treatment was more effective than deliberate no change-OR 2.97 [95% CI: 1.07-8.25], P = 0.031, but no particular strategy seemed to be more effective than the other. Left atrium area (OR 0.908 [95% CI: 0.842-0.979]) and number of treatment cycles (OR 0.457 [95% CI: 0.239-0.872]) were both adversely related to thrombus resolution. There was one ischemic and three bleeding adverse events during the treatment.
Conclusion: LAA thrombus resolution in patients already on OAC may require a change of previous OAC treatment but the overall effectiveness of dissolution seems to be about 50%.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Dissolution; Left atrial appendage; Resolution; Thrombus.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
MMF received lecturer fees from Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, and RD received lecturer fees from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim. All the other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent oral anticoagulation.Cardiol J. 2024;31(3):461-471. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0054. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Cardiol J. 2024. PMID: 35703043 Free PMC article.
-
Left atrial thrombus and smoke resolution in patients with atrial fibrillation under chronic oral anticoagulation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;64(3):773-781. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01169-1. Epub 2022 Mar 11. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 35277775
-
Diagnosis and management of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion or percutaneous left atrial procedures: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.Europace. 2020 Jan 1;22(1):162-169. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz257. Europace. 2020. PMID: 31501852
-
Prevalence of Left Atrial Thrombus in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;77(23):2875-2886. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.036. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34112315
-
Feasibility of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systematic Review.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;6(4):414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.11.017. Epub 2020 Jan 29. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32327075
Cited by
-
Diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for the malignant left atrial appendage: European Heart Rhythm Association physician survey.Europace. 2023 Jul 4;25(7):euad204. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad204. Europace. 2023. PMID: 37440757 Free PMC article.
-
Electric cardioversion in patients treated with oral anticoagulants: embolic material in the left atrial appendage.Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023 Jul-Aug 23;34(3):181-188. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2022-060. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023. PMID: 36478018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of Persistent Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Adequate Oral Anticoagulation: Pathways of Care for All-comers and Heart Failure Patients.Card Fail Rev. 2023 Apr 15;9:e05. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2022.28. eCollection 2023. Card Fail Rev. 2023. PMID: 37397240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper.Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4):euae035. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae035. Europace. 2024. PMID: 38291925 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the LAmbre Device Protected by a Cerebral Protection System in a 76-Year-Old Man with Persistent Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus.Am J Case Rep. 2022 Sep 14;23:e937063. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.937063. Am J Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 36101478 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical