Complete genome of the thermophilic purple sulfur Bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum compared to Allochromatium vinosum and other Chromatiaceae
- PMID: 34669148
- DOI: 10.1007/s11120-021-00870-y
Complete genome of the thermophilic purple sulfur Bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum compared to Allochromatium vinosum and other Chromatiaceae
Abstract
The complete genome sequence of the thermophilic purple sulfur bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum strain MCT (DSM 3771T) is described and contrasted with that of its mesophilic relative Allochromatium vinosum strain D (DSM 180T) and other Chromatiaceae. The Tch. tepidum genome is a single circular chromosome of 2,958,290 base pairs with no plasmids and is substantially smaller than the genome of Alc. vinosum. The Tch. tepidum genome encodes two forms of RuBisCO and contains nifHDK and several other genes encoding a molybdenum nitrogenase but lacks a gene encoding a protein that assembles the Fe-S cluster required to form a functional nitrogenase molybdenum-iron cofactor, leaving the phototroph phenotypically Nif-. Tch. tepidum contains genes necessary for oxidizing sulfide to sulfate as photosynthetic electron donor but is genetically unequipped to either oxidize thiosulfate as an electron donor or carry out assimilative sulfate reduction, both of which are physiological hallmarks of Alc. vinosum. Also unlike Alc. vinosum, Tch. tepidum is obligately phototrophic and unable to grow chemotrophically in darkness by respiration. Several genes present in the Alc. vinosum genome that are absent from the genome of Tch. tepidum likely contribute to the major physiological differences observed between these related purple sulfur bacteria that inhabit distinct ecological niches.
Keywords: Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria; Chromatiaceae; Hot spring; Purple sulfur bacteria; Thermochromatium tepidum; Thermophile.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O (2008) The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Badger MR, Bek EJ (2008) Multiple Rubisco forms in proteobacteria: their functional significance in relation to CO2 acquisition by the CBB cycle. J Exp Bot 59:1525–1541
-
- Baker JM, Riester CJ, Skinner BM, Newell AW, Swingley WD, Madigan MT, Jung DO, Asao M, Chen M, Loughlin PC, Pan H, Lin Y, Li Y, Shaw J, Prado M, Sherman C, Tang JK-H, Blankenship RE, Zhao T, Touchman JW, Sattley WM (2017) Genome sequence of Rhodoferax antarcticus ANT.BRT; a psychrophilic purple nonsulfur bacterium from an Antarctic microbial mat. Microorganisms 5:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms501008 - DOI - PMC
-
- Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477 - PubMed - PMC
-
- Boomer SM, Pierson BK, Austinhirst R, Castenhloz RW (2000) Characterization of novel bacteriochlorophyll-a-containing red filaments from alkaline hot springs in Yellowstone National Park. Arch Microbiol 174:152–161 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous
