Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;23(1):3-21.
doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00668-5. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an updated European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry policy document

Affiliations
Review

Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an updated European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry policy document

N A Lygidakis et al. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To update the existing European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) 2010 policy document on the 'Best Clinical Practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH).'

Methods: Experts, assigned the EAPD, worked on two different topics: (A) Aetiological factors involved in MIH, and (B) Treatment options for the clinical management of MIH. The group prepared two detailed systematic reviews of the existing literature relevant to the topics and following a consensus process produced the updated EAPD policy document on the 'Best Clinical Practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH).' The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of evidence regarding aetiology and treatment which was judged as HIGH, MODERATE, LOW or VERY LOW, while the GRADE criteria were used to indicate the strength of recommendation regarding treatment options as STRONG or WEAK/CONDITIONAL.

Results: (A) Regarding aetiology, it is confirmed that MIH has a multifactorial aetiology with the duration, strength and timing of occurrence of the aetiological factors being responsible for the variable clinical characteristics of the defect. Perinatal hypoxia, prematurity and other hypoxia related perinatal problems, including caesarean section, appear to increase the risk of having MIH, while certain infant and childhood illnesses are also linked with MIH. In addition, genetic predisposition and the role of epigenetic influences are becoming clearer following twin studies and genome and single-nucleotide polymorphisms analyses in patients and families. Missing genetic information might be the final key to truly understand MIH aetiology. (B) Regarding treatment options, composite restorations, preformed metal crowns and laboratory indirect restorations provide high success rates for the posterior teeth in appropriate cases, while scheduled extractions provide an established alternative option in severe cases. There is great need for further clinical and laboratory studies evaluating new materials and non-invasive/micro-invasive techniques for anterior teeth, especially when aesthetic and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) issues are concerned.

Conclusions: MIH has been studied more extensively in the last decade. Its aetiology follows the multifactorial model, involving systemic medical and genetic factors. Further focused laboratory research and prospective clinical studies are needed to elucidate any additional factors and refine the model. Successful preventive and treatment options have been studied and established. The appropriate choice depends on the severity of the defects and the age of the patient. EAPD encourages the use of all available treatment options, whilst in severe cases, scheduled extractions should be considered.

Keywords: Aetiology; Clinical practice; EAPD; Guidelines; MIH; Molar incisor hypomineralisation; Policy document; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MIH/HSPM clinical data short recording sheet and scoring details. Only teeth involved in MIH/HSPM and the relevant MIH characteristics are included (Ghanim et al. 2015)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MIH/HSPM clinical data long recording sheet and scoring details. Teeth involved in MIH/HSPM are highlighted grey. MIH and mDDE characteristics in all existing teeth are included (Ghanim et al. 2015)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
World map of MIH prevalence at present
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diagrammatic management summary according to factor-severity for MIH-affected molars. Severity is incrementally increased from the left to the right. To select the appropriate option, the block with the most severe sign/symptom should dominate the choice
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Diagrammatic management summary according to factor-severity for MIH-affected incisors. To select the appropriate option, the block with the most severe sign/symptom should dominate the choice

Comment in

References

    1. Alaluusua S. Aetiology of molar-incisor hypomineralisation: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11(2):53–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03262713. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alaluusua S, Lukinmaa P-L, Koskimies M, et al. Developmental dental defects associated with long breast feeding. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104(5/6):493–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00131.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ananth CV, Chauhan SP. Epidemiology of twinning in developed countries. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(3):156–161. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aps JKM, Lim LZ, Tong HJ, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of and indications for intraoral radiographs in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:429–462. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00532-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashley P, Noar J. Interceptive extractions for first permanent molars: a clinical protocol. Br Dent J. 2019;227(3):192–195. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0561-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources