Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty
- PMID: 34669217
- DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16084
Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty
Abstract
Objectives: As aortic valve repair (AVr) for aortic insufficiency (AI) expands, minimally invasive (Mi) approaches are increasingly being applied. Cardiac surgical techniques can be more difficult through small incisions, and this report analyzes medium-term outcomes for MiAVr facilitated by geometric ring annuloplasty.
Methods: Since 2013, 58 patients were selected for AVr through upper sternotomy third-interspace incisions. The average age was 58.9 ± 15.4 (mean ± SD) years, 71% were male, and preoperative AI grade was 3.6 ± 0.8. Sixty-two percent (36/58) had a proximal aortic replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms (n = 26) and/or remodeling grafts for aortic root aneurysms (n = 10). Annuloplasty rings were placed subannularly (69% trileaflet; 31% bicuspid), and leaflet procedures were performed in 70%. The average ring diameter was 21.6 ± 1.4 mm, and the average aortic clamp time was 113 ± 35 min.
Results: After repair, AI grade fell to an average of 0.5 ± 0.6 (p < .0001), with a mean valve gradient of 12.5 ± 7.1 mmHg. No operative mortalities or major complications occurred. Three patients required reoperations for bleeding, and two had pacemakers. At an average follow-up of 38 months (maximal 88 months), three late deaths and no valve-related complications were observed. Four patients required reoperative aortic valve replacement over follow-up, and Kaplan-Meier survival and freedom from reoperation both exceeded 80% at 88 months. At the last follow-up, the average AI grade was 0.7 ± 0.7, and the mean valve gradient was 12.7 ± 6.3 mmHg.
Conclusions: Geometric ring annuloplasty was safe and seemed to facilitate performing AVr ± proximal aortic replacement through Mi incisions. Hemodynamic improvements were significant, medium-term clinical outcomes were acceptable, and results could improve further with experience.
Keywords: aortic insufficiency; aortic valve repair; minimally invasive.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty.J Card Surg. 2022 Aug;37(8):2504. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16571. Epub 2022 Apr 29. J Card Surg. 2022. PMID: 35485724 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty.J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):5700. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17017. Epub 2022 Oct 11. J Card Surg. 2022. PMID: 36218017 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Miyahara S, Schneider U, Marganthaler L, Schaefers H-J. (Almost) all nonstenotic bicuspid aortic valves should be preserved or repaired. Sem Thoracic Surg. 2019;31:656-660.
-
- Caceres M, Ma Y, Rankin JS, et al. Mortality characteristics of aortic root surgery in North America. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(5):887-893.
-
- Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, Schmidt K, Langer F, Schafers H-J. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37(1):127-132.
-
- Price J, De Kerchove L, Glineur D, Vanoverschelde JL, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G. Risk of valve-related events after aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(2):606-612.
-
- de Meester C, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1913-1920.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials