Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence
- PMID: 34669724
- PMCID: PMC8528320
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256740
Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence
Erratum in
-
Correction: Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0263100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263100. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35061850 Free PMC article.
Abstract
During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. conservative politicians and the media downplayed the risk of both contracting COVID-19 and the effectiveness of recommended health behaviors. Health behavior theories suggest perceived vulnerability to a health threat and perceived effectiveness of recommended health-protective behaviors determine motivation to follow recommendations. Accordingly, we predicted that-as a result of politicization of the pandemic-politically conservative Americans would be less likely to enact recommended health-protective behaviors. In two longitudinal studies of U.S. residents, political conservatism was inversely associated with perceived health risk and adoption of health-protective behaviors over time. The effects of political orientation on health-protective behaviors were mediated by perceived risk of infection, perceived severity of infection, and perceived effectiveness of the health-protective behaviors. In a global cross-national analysis, effects were stronger in the U.S. (N = 10,923) than in an international sample (total N = 51,986), highlighting the increased and overt politicization of health behaviors in the U.S.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- De Hoog N, Stroebe W, De Wit JB. The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology. 2007. Sep;11(3):258–85. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.3.258 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical