Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;12(5):979-983.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736464. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

Implementing an Application Programming Interface for PROMIS Measures at Three Medical Centers

Michael Bass  1 , Christian Oncken  2 , Allison W McIntyre  3 , Chris Dasilva  3 , Joshua Spuhl  4 , Nan E Rothrock  1
Affiliations

Implementing an Application Programming Interface for PROMIS Measures at Three Medical Centers

Michael Bass et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing body of literature advocating for the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical care. Unfortunately, there are many barriers to integrating PRO measures, particularly computer adaptive tests (CATs), within electronic health records (EHRs), thereby limiting access to advances in PRO measures in clinical care settings.

Objective: To address this obstacle, we created and evaluated a software integration of an Application Programming Interface (API) service for administering and scoring Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures with the EHR system.

Methods: We created a RESTful API and evaluated the technical feasibility and impact on clinical workflow at three academic medical centers.

Results: Collaborative teams (i.e., clinical, information technology [IT] and administrative staff) performed these integration efforts addressing issues such as software integration as well as impact on clinical workflow. All centers considered their implementation successful based on the high rate of completed PROMIS assessments (between January 2016 and January 2021) and minimal workflow disruptions.

Conclusion: These case studies demonstrate not only the feasibility but also the pathway for the integration of PROMIS CATs into the EHR and routine clinical care. All sites utilized diverse teams with support and commitment from institutional leadership, initial implementation in a single clinic, a process for monitoring and optimization, and use of custom software to minimize staff burden and error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Wu A W, Cagney K A, St John P D. Health status assessment. Completing the clinical database. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(04):254–255. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients' voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(02):105–108. - PubMed
    1. Rotenstein L S, Agarwal A, O'Neil K. Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: lessons from an academic radiation oncology department. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(05):964–968. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner L I, Schink J, Bass M. Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer. 2015;121(06):927–934. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trotti A, Colevas A D, Setser A, Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(32):5121–5127. - PubMed