Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 May 1;48(5):630-631.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000850.

Conversion between the sum-of-segments axial length and traditional axial length measured by optical biometry

Affiliations
Comment

Conversion between the sum-of-segments axial length and traditional axial length measured by optical biometry

Akeno Tamaoki et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765–773
    1. Wang L, Cao D, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Calculation of axial length using a single group refractive index versus using different refractive indices for each ocular segment: theoretical study and refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology 2019;126:663–670
    1. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clin Ophthalmol 2020;14:1511–1519
    1. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. A comparison of two methods to calculate axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:284–292
    1. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:351–354

LinkOut - more resources