Conversion between the sum-of-segments axial length and traditional axial length measured by optical biometry
- PMID: 34670944
- DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000850
Conversion between the sum-of-segments axial length and traditional axial length measured by optical biometry
Comment on
-
Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;238(9):765-73. doi: 10.1007/s004170000188. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000. PMID: 11045345
References
-
- Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765–773
-
- Wang L, Cao D, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Calculation of axial length using a single group refractive index versus using different refractive indices for each ocular segment: theoretical study and refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology 2019;126:663–670
-
- Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clin Ophthalmol 2020;14:1511–1519
-
- Cooke DL, Cooke TL. A comparison of two methods to calculate axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:284–292
-
- Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:351–354
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
