Treatment of the Carotid In-stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 34671314
- PMCID: PMC8521022
- DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.748304
Treatment of the Carotid In-stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background and Purpose: In-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stent (CAS) is not uncommon. We aimed to evaluate therapeutic options for ISR after CAS. Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE until November 2, 2020 for studies including the treatment for ISR after CAS. Results: In total, 35 studies, covering 1,374 procedures in 1,359 patients, were included in this review. Most cases (66.3%) were treated with repeat CAS (rCAS), followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (17.5%), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) (14.3%), carotid artery bypass (1.5%), and external beam radiotherapy (0.4%). The rates of stroke & TIA within the postoperative period were similar in three groups (PTA 1.1%, rCAS 1.1%, CEA 1.5%). CEA (2.5%) was associated with a slightly higher rate of postoperative death than rCAS (0.7%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, the rate of long-term stroke & TIA in PTA was 5.7%, significantly higher than rCAS (1.8%, P = 0.036). PTA (27.8%) was also associated with a significantly higher recurrent restenosis rate than rCAS (8.2%, P = 0.002) and CEA (1.6%, P < 0.001). The long-term stroke & TIA and recurrent restenosis rates showed no significant difference between rCAS and CEA. Conclusions: rCAS is the most common treatment for ISR, with low postoperative risk and low long-term risk. CEA is an important alternative for rCAS. PTA may be less recommended due to the relatively high long-term risks of stroke & TIA and recurrent restenosis.
Keywords: carotid artery stent (CAS); carotid endarterectomy (CEA); in-stent restenosis (ISR); percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); treatment.
Copyright © 2021 Huang, Wu, Guo, Zhang, Zhao, Yu and Luo.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of redo stenting versus endarterectomy for in-stent stenosis after carotid artery stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.102. Epub 2020 Aug 28. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32861870
-
A Review on the Comparison of Different Treatments for Carotid In-Stent Restenosis.Can J Neurol Sci. 2019 Nov;46(6):666-681. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2019.277. Can J Neurol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31581961 Review.
-
Technical options for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1486-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.106. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27776704 Review.
-
Carotid endarterectomy with stent removal for recurring in-stent restenosis: A case report and literature review.Surg Neurol Int. 2022 May 6;13:192. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1222_2021. eCollection 2022. Surg Neurol Int. 2022. PMID: 35673638 Free PMC article.
-
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040. J Vasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16476606
Cited by
-
Comparison of carotid endarterectomy and repeated carotid angioplasty and stenting for in-stent restenosis (CERCAS trial): a randomised study.Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Oct;8(5):399-404. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002075. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023. PMID: 36972920 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diabetes and restenosis.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Feb 14;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01460-5. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022. PMID: 35164744 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Subclavian-Carotid Bypass as a Solution to Recurrent Carotid Artery Stenosis Post Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Stenting.Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63087. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39055438 Free PMC article.
-
First-in-Men Treatment of Carotid Artery In-Stent Restenosis with a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon Technology.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jun;46(6):819-820. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03408-y. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36949183 No abstract available.
-
Ultrasound diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis and occlusion.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Oct;49(4):675-687. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01259-7. Epub 2022 Sep 29. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022. PMID: 36175716 Review.
References
-
- Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, Debus S, de Haro J, Halliday A, et al. . Editor's choice - management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the european society for vascular surgery (esvs). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2018) 55:3–81. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Howard G, Roubin GS, Jansen O, Hendrikse J, Halliday A, Fraedrich G, et al. . Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1305–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01309-4 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources