The Association of Real-World CA 19-9 Level Monitoring Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 34671563
- PMCID: PMC8522478
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.754687
The Association of Real-World CA 19-9 Level Monitoring Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer is expected to be the third deadliest cancer in the US in 2021. Evaluation of treatment response in patients with mPDAC necessitates scheduled clinical and radiographic assessments along with monitoring serum CA 19-9 levels. Currently available single-institution data examining the importance of CA 19-9 monitoring cannot be generalized to real-world settings. We investigated the impact of serum CA 19-9 monitoring and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with mPDAC in a population-based setting.
Methods: Data were extracted from the Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database for patients diagnosed with mPDAC between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. Serum CA 19-9 levels at baseline - defined as the values obtained ≤ 60 days prior to treatment initiation - and during treatment were extracted. CA 19-9 levels > 40 IU/mL were considered elevated. Survival outcomes were compared based on testing frequency, baseline CA 19-9 levels, and change in CA 19-9.
Results: 6,118 patients with mPDAC who received treatment were included in the analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (IQR: 61-75). Patients with normal baseline CA 19-9 experienced longer median survival than patients with elevated levels [1L: 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.9 - 10) vs. 7.2 months (6.8 - 7.5), p < 0.001; 2L: 7.2 months (6.1 - 9.2) vs. 5.2 months (4.9 - 5.6), p < 0.001; 3L: 6.1 months (5.4 - 9.1) vs. 3.9 months (3.4 - 4.3), p < 0.001]. Patients with decreasing/stable CA 19-9 during treatment experienced longer survival than patients who experienced an increase in CA 19-9 levels [1L: 10.9 months (10.5 - 11.3) vs. 5.4 months (5.1 - 5.9), p < 0.0001; 2L: 8.2 months (7.7 - 8.5) vs. 4.3 months (4.1 - 4.7), p < 0.001; 3L: 7.5 months (6.6 - 9.2) vs. 3.7 months (3.4 - 4.3), p < 0.001].
Conclusions: In one of the largest, contemporary, real-world studies of patients with mPDAC, elevated CA 19-9 level at treatment initiation demonstrated a prognostic impact. Routine serial monitoring of CA 19-9 levels during treatment may be warranted, in addition to clinical and radiographic assessment, and may translate into better patient outcomes. Further validation studies are needed to understand the generalizability of these results.
Keywords: CA 19-9; chemotherapy; metastatic pancreatic cancer; overall survival; prognostic factor.
Copyright © 2021 George, Kent, Surinach, Lamarre and Cockrum.
Conflict of interest statement
BG reports a consulting/advisory relationship with Ipsen. MK, AS, and NL are employees of Genesis Research which receives funding for consulting services from Ipsen. PC is an employee of and has stock in Ipsen. This study was sponsored by Ipsen. The sponsor had the following involvement in the study: design of the study, analysis, and interpretation as well as review of the manuscript.
Figures




References
-
- Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. , eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources