Procedural skill maintenance: Perspectives and motivations of pediatric emergency medicine faculty

Abstract

Background: Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians receive training in critical procedures, but these procedures are rare in practice. The literature on maintenance of procedural skills focuses on ways to practice (e.g., via simulation) and pays little attention to motivation's role. Understanding what motivates PEM physicians to maintain procedural skills can inform the design of supportive policies and interventions. Our study explores how PEM physicians conceptualize maintenance of procedural skills, what motivates them to maintain procedural skills, and barriers to procedural skill maintenance.

Methods: This was a qualitative study of 12 PEM faculty guided by the self-determination theory (SDT) of motivation. SDT describes a typology that distinguishes extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, with intrinsic motivation based on autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Interviews were transcribed and coded using constant-comparative technique, and interviews continued until thematic sufficiency was achieved.

Results: Participants had difficulty defining procedural skill maintenance by specific criteria and expressed ambivalence about external standards for competence, noting the need to account for individual and local practice factors. Three themes characterizing participants' motivation for procedural skills maintenance included: (1) desire to provide optimal patient care and fear of unsuccessful performance (competence), (2) procedural competence as part of the identity of a PEM physician who teaches and performs procedures (competence and relatedness), and (3) desire for accessibility and choice of options in maintaining procedural skills (autonomy). Participants identified lack of opportunities, time, and support as barriers to motivation and skills maintenance.

Conclusion: SDT concepts were integral to understanding faculty motivation, and this highlights the need for prioritizing faculty autonomy, competence, and relatedness in designing supports for procedural skill maintenance. Our findings regarding the difficulty in defining maintenance of skills emphasize the need for further discussion and study of this topic.