National analysis of the Modified Monash Model, population distribution and a socio-economic index to inform rural health workforce planning
- PMID: 34672057
- DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12805
National analysis of the Modified Monash Model, population distribution and a socio-economic index to inform rural health workforce planning
Abstract
Aims: To describe the population distribution and socio-economic position of residents across all states and territories of Australia, stratified using the 7 Modified Monash Model classifications. The numerical summary, and the methods described, can be applied by a variety of end users including workforce planners, researchers, policy-makers and funding bodies for guiding future investment under different scenarios, and aid in evaluating geographically focused programs.
Context: The Commonwealth Department of Health is transitioning to the Modified Monash Model to objectively describe geographical access. This change applies to the Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Program, one of the Australian Government's key policies to address the maldistribution of the rural health workforce. Unlike the previously applied Australian Statistical Geography Standard-Remoteness Areas, a summary of the population in each Modified Monash Model classification is not available, nor is a socio-economic overview of the communities within these areas.
Approach: Spatial analysis of Australian Bureau of Statistics data (Modified Monash Model, population data and the Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage collected or derived from the 2016 census) at the Statistical Area 1-the smallest unit for the release of census data.
Conclusion: Linking the Modified Monash Model, a socio-economic index and granular population data at the national level highlights the disadvantage of many residents in small rural towns (Modified Monash 5). The Modified Monash Model does not exhibit a continuum of the largest population residing in the most accessible classification and the smallest population residing in the least accessible classification that is seen in the Australian Statistical Geography Standard-Remoteness Areas. Coupled with policy relevance, the advantage of using the Modified Monash Model as the basis for analysis is that it highlights areas that have both a critical mass of residents and differing levels of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. This will help end users to target funding to those regions where there is potential to improve access to services for the greatest number of rural residents.
Keywords: GIS; Modified Monash Model; Remoteness Areas; geographical information systems; regional health; remote health; rural health; social determinants; spatial analysis.
© 2021 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Geographical distribution of 3 allied health professions in South Australia: A summary of access and disadvantage.Aust J Rural Health. 2021 Oct;29(5):721-728. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12816. Epub 2021 Oct 12. Aust J Rural Health. 2021. PMID: 34636104
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Demonstrating a new approach to planning and monitoring rural medical training distribution to meet population need in North West Queensland.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):993. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3788-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30577775 Free PMC article.
-
Reviewing reliance on overseas-trained doctors in rural Australia and planning for self-sufficiency: applying 10 years' MABEL evidence.Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jan 22;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0339-z. Hum Resour Health. 2019. PMID: 30670027 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A review of rural and remote health service indexes: are they relevant for the development of an Australian rural birth index?BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 10;14:548. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0548-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25491346 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Addressing the lack of research in rural communities through building rural health service research: Establishment of a research unit in Colac, a medium rural town.Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Aug;30(4):536-539. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12860. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Aust J Rural Health. 2022. PMID: 35254718 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Australian clinical trial landscape: Perceptions of rural, regional and remote health service capacity and capability.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 19;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01270-z. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 39702376 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of the barriers and facilitators to accessing and utilising mental health services across regional, rural, and remote Australia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10034-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37794469 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences of Non-Metropolitan Youth Towards Accessing Mental Health Services: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70052. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70052. Aust J Rural Health. 2025. PMID: 40270473 Free PMC article.
-
Equitable Care for Older Australians: A Comparative Analysis of Aged Care Workforce Shortages in Metropolitan, Rural, and Remote Australia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;22(5):656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050656. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40427773 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Deaths in Australia; 2020. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-expectancy-death/deaths-in-australi.... Accessed September 9, 2021.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural & remote health; 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-remote-he.... Accessed September 9, 2021.
-
- Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19:127-140.
-
- Khan AA. An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socioecon Plan Sci. 1992;26:275-287.
-
- Beard JR, Tomaska N, Earnest A, Summerhayes R, Morgan G. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health. Aust J Rural Health. 2009;17(1):10-15.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical