Histologically benign PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions contain cancer-associated epigenetic alterations
- PMID: 34672371
- DOI: 10.1002/pros.24255
Histologically benign PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions contain cancer-associated epigenetic alterations
Abstract
Background: The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer has improved with the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Yet, even with MRI-guided biopsy 15%-35% of high-risk lesions (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 4 and 5) are histologically benign. It is unclear if these false positives are due to diagnostic/sampling errors or pathophysiological alterations. To better understand this, we tested histologically benign PI-RAD 4 and 5 lesions for common malignant epigenetic alterations.
Materials and methods: MRI-guided in-bore biopsy samples were collected from 45 patients with PI-RADS 4 (n = 31) or 5 (n = 14) lesions. Patients had a median clinical follow-up of 3.8 years. High-risk mpMRI patients were grouped based on their histology into biopsy positive for tumor (BPT; n = 28) or biopsy negative for tumor (BNT; n = 17). From these biopsy samples, DNA methylation of well-known tumor suppressor genes (APC, GSTP1, and RARβ2) was quantified.
Results: Similar to previous work we observed high rates of promoter methylation at GSTP1 (92.7%), RARβ2 (57.3%), and APC (37.8%) in malignant BPT samples but no methylation in benign TURP chips. Interestingly, similar to the malignant samples the BNT biopsies also had increased methylation at the promoter of GSTP1 (78.8%) and RARβ2 (34.6%). However, despite these epigenetic alterations none of these BNT patients developed prostate cancer, and those who underwent repeat mpMRI (n = 8) demonstrated either radiological regression or stability.
Conclusions: Histologically benign PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions harbor prostate cancer-associated epigenetic alterations.
Keywords: MRI-guided biopsy; epigenetics; methylation biomarkers; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bjurlin MA, Taneja SS. Standards for prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(2):155-161. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000031
-
- Elwenspoek MMC, Sheppard AL, McInnes MDF, et al. Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy alone for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198427. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8427
-
- Kilic M, Vural M, Coskun B, et al. Accuracy of sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(2):249-254. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.010
-
- Overduin CG, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO. MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(3):209-213. doi:10.1007/s11934-013-0323-z
-
- Yegnasubramanian S. Prostate cancer epigenetics and its clinical implications. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(4):549-558. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.179859
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous