Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151041.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151041. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

The role of plant-based alternative foods in sustainable and healthy food systems: Consumption trends in the UK

Affiliations

The role of plant-based alternative foods in sustainable and healthy food systems: Consumption trends in the UK

Carmelia Alae-Carew et al. Sci Total Environ. .

Abstract

A global transformation towards sustainable food systems is crucial for delivering on climate change mitigation targets worldwide. In high- and middle-income settings, plant-based meat and dairy alternatives present potential substitutes for animal sourced foods, and a pathway to transition to more sustainable diets. We examined plant-based alternative foods (PBAF) consumption trends in the UK by analysing repeated cross-sectional food consumption data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008-2019. Dietary data for 15,655 individuals aged 1.5 years and over were analysed to assess aggregate change in intake of PBAF and six other food groups that play a role in transformative dietary change. Characteristics associated with consumption of PBAF were explored using logistic regression, and consumption patterns in high and low meat consumers were explored by examining intake of potential animal product substitute food groups. The proportion of individuals reporting consumption of any PBAFs increased from 6.7% in 2008-2011, to 13.1% in 2017-2019 (p < 0.01). Compared to 2008-2011 PBAF consumption rose by 115% in 2017-2019 (p < 0.01). Females were 46% more likely than males to report consumption of PBAF (p < 0.01). Millennials (age 24-39 years) were the most likely generation to report PBAF consumption (p < 0.01 compared to generation Z (age 11-23 years) and traditionalists (age 75+ years)), as were individuals of the highest income tertile (p < 0.01). Among "low meat consumers", PBAF consumption was on average higher than "high meat consumers" (18.6 g versus 4.8 g PBAF per day, p < 0.01). Our results support the hypothesis of a pivotal role of PBAF in the transition towards sustainable food systems in the UK, by demonstrating they are becoming increasingly popular among UK consumers. This highlights the urgent need to assess in detail the environmental and health impacts of large scale and population-wide consumption of PBAF in comparison to their animal-based equivalents.

Keywords: Dietary trends; Food system transformations; Plant-based alternative foods; Sustainable food systems; United Kingdom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Unlabelled Image
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trends in proportion of people reporting consumption of plant-based alternative foods (%); aggregate change over time. *indicates p test for trend value <0.01.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trends in mean daily reported consumption of selected food groups from 2008 to 2011 to 2017–2019, in grams/capita/day; aggregate change over time. *indicates p-test for trend <0.01. †Excludes dairy products used in baked goods, confectionery and desserts, and yogurt, cream and milk used in composite dishes.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trends in mean daily intake of selected food groups as a proportion of total daily dietary energy intake from 2008 to 2011 to 2017–2019; aggregate change over time. *indicates p-test for trend <0.01. †Excludes dairy products used in baked goods, confectionery and desserts, and yogurt, cream and milk used in composite dishes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean daily consumption of selected food groups by category of meat consumer (g/capita/day). Meat consumers defined by meeting UKCCC's 2050 meat consumption target of 94.3 g/capita/day for males, and 66.8 g/capita/day for females (low meat consumption), or eating above this target amount (high meat consumption). *indicates p value <0.01. †Excludes dairy products used in baked goods, confectionery and desserts, and yogurt, cream and milk used in composite dishes.

References

    1. 2021. The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Admendment) Order 2019.https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/1056/contents/made Available from.
    1. Aleksandrowicz L., Green R., EJM Joy, Smith P., Haines A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PloS one. 2016;11(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165797. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apostolidis C., McLeay F. Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy. 2016;65:74–89.
    1. Attwood S., Hajat C. How will the COVID-19 pandemic shape the future of meat consumption? Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(17):3116–3120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barton K.L., Wrieden W.L., Sherriff A., Armstrong J., Anderson A.S. Trends in socio-economic inequalities in the scottish diet: 2001–2009. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(16):2970–2980. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000361. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources